ws internacional sp2040: apresentação mobilidade

8/4/2019 WS Internacional SP2040: Apresentação Mobilidade

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ws-internacional-sp2040-apresentacao-mobilidade 1/25

SP2040

São Paulo Strategic Plan

Mobility and Accessibility



Structure

Diagnostic

Trends

Propositions

Looking back...



Population and Employment

Year Area Popul. Empl. HH Cars Emp/Pop Car/Pop

(1000) (1000) (1000) (veh/1000)

1997

Met. Reg. 16,792 6,959 3,092 0,41 184

São Paulo 9,857 4,627 0,47

Other Mun. 6,935 2,332 0,34

2007

Met. Reg. 19,535 9,066 3,601 0,46 184

São Paulo 10,897 5,930 0,54

Other Mun. 8,638 3,136 0,36

Source: 2007 OD Survey



Population density – 2007



Employment density – 2007



Consequences on travelAverage travel time – 1997 and 2007



Transport Supply

Metrô ~70 km – slow growth (~2km/year)

expanding faster recently

Trains ~110 km – share tracks with freight

on-going improvement program

Bus corridors ~130 km existing

plans for extension exists, but no commitment Road system – highly congested

rotation system – based on license plate



Travel demand – 2007

RMSP ~ 40 million trips/day (all modes)

São Paulo ~23 million trips/day (all modes)

~2 trips/person x day (all modes)

Modal split (2007)

~1/3 each – private/public/walking

motorized: 55% public / 45% private



Policy, Finance and Institutions

Non-integrated transport and land use policies

Investment limited to fiscal sources

subsidy to operations (metro, train, bus)

No regional coordination

fragmentation of responsibilities

superposition of authorities

Lack of policy addressing logistics



Trends

Demand for floorspace in 2040

25% to 30% addition to current stock

where will this be located?

Demand for motorized travel

~50% growth from current levels

how to cater for this demand?

Demand for freight limited data

double between 2000 and 2020 (State)

how to minimize impacts?



13 Propositions - Delphi

Demand management through land use (2)

Demand management through congestionscharging (1)

Extending and improving supply (4) Priority to non-motorized travel (1)

Financing (1)

Access to the city (1)

Freight logistics (1)

Emissions (1)

Institutions (1)



Land use propositions

Improve jobs-housing balance

Agree: 96% / Importance: 96%

move jobs or population?

Selective higher density with mixed use


e.g., urban operations on brownfields

Transport in a supporting role



Transport supply propositions

Wide-coverage integrated public transport

network - Modal split: 80% / 20%


Metro extension to 240 km in 2040

Disagree: 18% / Importance: 86%

from 7 to 20 km/million pop.



Transport supply propositions

Trains upgraded to metro standards


on-going project

Intermediate capacity public transport

system – BRT, LRT...Agree: 98% / Importance: 100%

what function in the integrated network?



Demand management

Congestion charging, when public transport

network reaches minimum density levels

Disagree: 20% / Importance: 76%

Safe and comfortable sidewalks and cycle

network


Non-motorized travel



Financing

Value capture


value added by gains in differential

accessibility



Access to the city

Rail services to neighbouring major cities(Santos, Campinas, S. J. dos Campos, Sorocaba)

Agree: 95% / Importance: 92% Rail access to airports


Substantial improvementes to airports

capacity and service standards




Freight logistics

Promote logistics projects under a coallition

of stakeholders


ring road and ring railway projects

peripherical logistic platforms with

intermodal terminals



Vehicular emissions

Use new technologies to reduce emissions


high and intermediate capacity public

transport electrified

cars, buses, trucks, motorcycles to move

to non-fossil energy sources



Institutional issues

Cooperative (city,state, federal) governance

mechanism for planning and operation of

public transport network Agree: 98% / Importance: 98%



Related catalytic projetcs

Compact city

30 minute city

Can the latter be obtained without the

former?



To make a long story short...



Looking back

Everybody’s wish list

Many are not under city responsibility

Serious mobility and accessibility problems

Require significant change

Reacted with (current) conventional thinking

although different from past policies

No priorities have been clearly set



Resources needed for change

Money

Ideas(Including ideas for obtaining money)



Some possibilities

Lots of money, lots of metro

Less money, more BRTs or similar

are BRTs really a Plan B?

No money, one priority

pedestrians

the rest will come?

Wide-reaching x local projects

ws internacional sp2040: apresentação mobilidade

Documents