1/12

EVTIME

VITAND: ENCO

(D

DO ERRONTRAN

CA

DISPON

P

OS DURNDO A

ADA FU

NIBILIZA

Ric

Professor – Fun

RANTEAS PESSOUNÇÃO

ADO AP

cardo Viana

Professor – G

ndação Institut

© Ric

E A FOROAS CE USAND

PENAS

a Vargas, M

Getulio Vargas

to de AdministPartner

ricardo.var

cardo Viana Varga

PM

Edi

RMAÇÃERTAS PDO O M

EM ING

MSc, IPMA

Foundation (F

tração (FIA – Ur – Macrosolutirgas@macrosolu

s. Todos os Direito

Pub

MI Global Cong

inburgh - Scot

ÃO DO PARA

MBTI®

GLÊS)

A-B, PMP

FGV) – Brasil

USP) - Brasil ions – Brasil utions.com.br

os Reservados.

blicações

gress EMEA

tland - 2005

2/12

ABSTRAC

This article

Briggs Typ

comprehen

Manageme

concordanreducing p

TEAM AC

The projec

knowledge

As reporteprocesses

project. It i

and others

map of the

→ Hum

resp

ma

→ Acq

pro

→ Dev

me

→ Ma

feedper

These procareas. Eac

depending

The staff a

find the mo

CT

e presents

pe Indicator

nsion of th

ent function

ce with the otentials co

CQUISITION

ct human r

e areas that

ed in the G required to

ncludes all

s. The main

e processes.

man Resou

ponsibilities

nagement p

quire Projec

oject.

velop Proje

mbers to en

nage Proje

dback, resrformance.

cesses interch process

on the need

acquisition a

ost adequate

a vision of

r© (MBTI) a

e relation b

ns, is pos

individual pnflicts and p

N IN THE P

resources a

the manage

Guide, the P make the m

project stak

processes

.

urces Plan

, and repo

plan.

ct Team – O

ct Team– I

nhance proje

ect Team

olving issu

ract with eas may invo

ds of the pr

approached

e profession

the model

and its appl

between th

ssible to a

preferences problems in

PROJECT

area is one

er and proje

Project Hummost effectiv

keholders: s

are describ

ning – Ide

orting relatio

Obtaining the

Improving t

ect perform

- Tracking

es, and c

ach other anolve effort f

oject.

in this pap

nal to each p

ls of prefer

lication for

he 16 MBT

attribute fu

, increasing the project.

e of the P

ct team hav

man Resouve use of hu

sponsors, cu

bed below a

entifying an

onships, as

e human res

the compet

ance.

g team me

oordinating

Exhib

nd with the from one o

er involves

project func

ences pres

the Staff A

TI Types wi

nctions ins

the motiva.

PMBOK Gu

ve requested

rces Managuman resour

ustomers, in

and Exhibit

nd docume

s well as c

sources nee

encies and

ember perf

changes

bit 1 – Human Res

process in or more in

the increas

ction (VARGA

sented by t

Acquisition. U

ith the mai

side the p

ation of the

uide 3rd (P

d more atten

gement incrces involved

ndividual co

1 provides

enting proje

creating the

eded to com

interaction

formance,

to enhance

sources Managem

the other kndividuals o

e of the ca

AS, 2004).

he Myers

Using the

in project

project in

team and

MI 2004)

ntion.

ludes the d with the

ontributors

the mind

ect roles,

e staffing

mplete the

n of team

providing

e project

ent Processes.

nowledge or groups

pability to

3/12

MYERS-B

The purpo

make the t

useful in p

variation in

difference i

The Myers

mother, Ka

practical an

With MBTI

developme

expectation

personal as

MBTI® furt

→ How

→ How

→ How

→ How

→ Howpro

The MBTI through a

bank with m

4 letters th

judgment, a

→ E oIntr

→ S o

→ T o

→ J oPer

The Intern

http://www

BRIGGS TY

se of the M

theory of ps

people’s live

n the behav

n the way in

s-Briggs Ty

atharine Co

nd useful in

® people le

ent and the

ns. MBTI® a

s well as for

ther indicate

w to improv

w to improv

w to deepen

w to create

w to endooductivity. ® test is a questionna

millions of p

at picture th

as follows:

or I – Wheroverts)

or N – How t

r F – How th

or P – Howrceiving) net has a

w.humanmet

YPE INDICA

Myers-Briggs

sychologica

es. The ess

vior is actua

ndividual pre

pe Indicato

ook Briggs,

people's liv

earn to ide

kinds of w

also indicate

r organizatio

es:

ve interperso

ve the ability

n self-knowl

more produ

ow your o

applied by aire with 93

people who

he exercise

ere the pers

the person o

he person ta

w the perso

a series o

trics.com an

ATOR® (M

s Type Indi

al types des

sence of th

ally quite o

efer to use t

or® was de

to make

ves.

ntify their c

work more a

es how relat

onal success

onal relation

y to lead with

ledge

uctive and p

organization

CPP (Cent multiple ch

have alread

of the indiv

son prefers

obtains infor

akes decisio

n guides h

f tests av

nd http://blo

MBTI®)

cator® (MB

scribed by C

he theory is

orderly and

their percep

eveloped by

C.G. Jung'

characteristic

adequate to

tionships an

s.

ships

h efficiency

participating

with high

ter for Applhoice quest

dy used MBT

vidual prefer

s to focus

rmation abo

ons (Thinkin

im/herself r

vailable to

oginality.love

BTI®) perso

C. G. Jung

s that much

consistent,

tion and jud

y Isabel Br

s theory o

cs, their po

o their type,

nd aptness c

work teams

her patterns

lications of tions, tabula

TI®. The res

rences rega

his/her atte

out things (S

g or Feeling

regarding th

MBTI®,

e-productio

onality inven

understand

h seemingly

being due

dgment.

riggs Myers

f psycholog

oints of stre

special ab

can be deve

s

s of efficie

Psychologiated throug

sult is prese

rding perce

ention (Extr

Sensors or In

g)

he world (Ju

such as t

ns.com.

ntory is to

dable and

y random

e to basic

s and her

gical type

ength and

bilities and

eloped for

ency and

ical Type) gh a data

ented with

eption and

roverts or

ntuitives)

udging or

the sites

4/12

THE SIXT

By combin

Briggs Mye

be present

ISTJ - Qu

matter-of-fa

toward it sand organiz

ISFJ - Quie

their obliga

remember

others feel

home.

INFJ - SeeWant to

Conscientio

to serve the

INTJ - Hav

their goals.

perspective

1 Excerpted fro

EEN TYPE

ing the indiv

ers has prep

ed below. J

di

Jd

iP

ii

INTR

OVE

RTS

EXTR

AVE

RTS

uite, serious

act, realistic

teadily, regazed – their w

et, friendly, r

ations. Thor

specifics a

. Strive to

ek meaning understand

ous and com

e common g

ve original m

. Quickly se

es. When c

om Introduction t

ES1

vidual prefer

pared a bas

ISTJ

ISTP

ESTP

ESTJ

WithThinking

SEN

Judg

ing

Judg

ing

Perc

eivi

ng

s, earn suc

c, and respo

ardless of d work, their h

responsible

rough, pains

about peop

create an

and connecd what m

mmitted to t

good. Orga

minds and g

ee patterns

committed,

to Type by Isabe

rences we h

sic set of ch

ISFJ

ISFP

ESFP

ESFJ

gWit

Feel

NSORS

Exhibit 1 –

ccess by th

onsible. Dec

distractions. home, their

, and consc

staking, and

le who are

orderly and

ction in ideaotivates pe

their firm va

nized and d

great drive

in external e

organize a

el Briggs Myers

have the sixt

haracteristics

INFJ

INFP

ENFP

ENFJ

Tthing

INTUITIV

Sixteen Psycholog

horoughnes

cide logically

Take pleas life. Value tr

cientious. Co

d accurate.

e important

d harmoniou

as, relationseople and

alues. Develo

decisive in im

for impleme

events and

a job and c

published by CP

teen psycho

s for each o

INTJ

INTP

ENTP

ENTJ

Withhinking

VES

JudgingJudging

Perceiving

gical Types (©Con

ss and dep

y what shou

sure in makiraditions and

ommitted a

Loyal, con

to them, c

us environm

ships, and m are insig

op a clear v

mplementing

enting their

develop lon

carry it thro

PP. Inc.

ological Typ

of these type

INTR

OVE

RTSEXTRA

VERTS

sulting Psychologi

pendability.

uld be done

ng everythind loyalty.

nd steady in

nsiderate, n

concerned

ment at wor

material poshtful abou

vision about

g their vision

ideas and

ng-range ex

ough. Skep

pes. Isabel

es, as will

ists Press Inc.).

Practical,

and work

ng orderly

n meeting

otice and

with how

rk and at

ssessions. t others.

how best

n.

achieving

xplanatory

ptical and

5/12

independenand others

ISTP - Tole

find workab

amounts of

organize fa

ISFP - Qui

around theLoyal and

disagreeme

INFP - Ideaexternal life

catalysts fo

potential. A

INTP - Se

Theoretical

contained, problems in

ESTP - Flex

Theories asolve the p

they can b

doing.

ESFP - Oucomforts. E

realistic apreadily to n

people.

ENFP - W

connection

based on t

appreciatioimprovise a

ENTP - Qu

and challe

analyzing th

do the sam

nt, have hig.

erant and fle

ble solution

f data to iso

acts using lo

et, friendly,

em. Like to committed

ents and co

alistic, loyal e that is con

or implemen

Adaptable, fl

eek to dev

l and abstr

flexible, ann their area

xible and to

and conceptproblem. Foc

be active wi

tgoing, frienEnjoy workin

pproach to tnew people

Warmly enth

ns between

the patterns

on and sup and their ver

uick, ingenio

enging prob

hem strateg

me thing the

gh standard

exible, quiet

s. Analyze w

olate the cor

ogical princip

sensitive, a

have their to their valu

onflicts; do n

to their valungruent with

nting ideas.

lexible, and

velop logic

ract, interes

nd adaptab of interest.

olerant, they

tual explanacus o n the

th others. E

ndly, and acng with othe

their work, e and enviro

husiastic an

events an

s they see.

pport. Sponrbal fluency

ous, stimula

blems. Ade

gically. Good

same way,

ds of comp

observers

what makes

re of practic

ples, value e

and kind. E

own spaceues and to

not force the

ues and to ph their values

Seek to und

accepting u

cal explanat

sted more

ble. Have u Skeptical, s

take a prag

ations bore here-and-n

Enjoy mater

ccepting. $Eers to make

and make wonments. L

nd imaginat

nd informati

Want a lot

ntaneous a.

ating, alert, a

ept at gen

d at reading

apt to turn

petence and

until a prob

s things wo

cal problems

efficiency.

njoy the pre

e and to wo people who

eir opinions

people who s. Curious, q

derstand pe

unless a valu

tions for e

in ideas th

unusual abilsometimes c

gmatic appro

e them – thnow, sponta

rial comforts

Exuberant lo things happ

work fun. FLearn best b

ive. See lif

ion very qu

of affirmatio

and flexible,

and outspo

erating con

g other peop

to one new

d performan

lem appear

ork and read

s. Interested

esent mome

ork within tho are impor

or values on

are importa quick to see

eople and to

ue is threate

everything t

han in socia

lity to focucritical, alwa

oach focuse

hey want toaneous, enjo

s and style

overs of life, pen. Bring c

Flexible and by trying a

fe as full o

uickly, and

on from oth

, often rely

oken. Resou

nceptual po

ple. Bored b

interest afte

nce – for th

s, then act

dily get thro

d in cause a

ent, what’s

heir own timrtant to them

n others.

ant to theme possibilitie

o help them

ened.

that interes

al interactio

s in depth ays analytica

ed immediat

o act energeoy each mo

. Learn bes

people, andcommon sen

spontaneo new skill w

of possibilitie

confidently

hers, and re

y on their

urceful in so

ossibilities a

by routine, w

er another.

hemselves

quickly to

ough large

and effect,

going on

me frame. m. Dislike

. Want an es, can be

fulfill their

sts them.

on. Quiet,

to solve al.

te results.

etically to ment that

st through

d material nse and a

us, adapt with other

es. Make

y proceed

eadily give

ability to

olving new

and then

will seldom

6/12

ESTJ - PraOrganize p

efficient wa

systematica

ESFJ - W

environmen

complete tNotice wha

appreciated

ENFJ - Waneeds, and

their poten

praise andleadership.

ENTJ - Fra

proceduresorganizatio

informed, w

Forceful in

PROJECT

PSYCHOL

Based in th

environmen

difficulties t

Based in t

consolidate

the Profess

ISTJ

→ Wo

with

→ Pat

and

pos

→ Leama

actical, realisprojects and

ay possible.

ally follow th

Warmhearte

nt; work w

tasks accurat others n

d for who th

arm, empathd motivation

tial. May ac

d criticism.

ank, decisiv

s and policonal problem

well read,

presenting t

T MANAGE

LOGICAL TY

he psycholo

nt of project

to the work

the work of

ed the follow

sional Growt

orkplace Co

hin the syste

thway to Pr

d people iss

sitive roles in

adership Quintaining res

stic, matter-d people to

Take care o

hem and wa

ed, conscie

with determ

rately and oneed in thei

hey are and

hetic, responns of others

t as catalys

Sociable,

ve, assume

cies, develoms. Enjoy

enjoy expa

their ideas.

EMENT FUN

YPES

ogical types

ts, each one

in projects.

f KROEGER

wing aspec

th, Leadersh

ontribution -

em to mana

rofessional

sues - idea

n organizatio

ualities - Brspect and o

of-fact. Dec get things

of routine d

ant others to

entious, an

ination to

on time. Lor day-by-da

for what the

nsive, and rs. Find pote

ts for individ

facilitate o

leadership

op and imp long-term

anding their

NCTIONS R

s presented

e of the typ

R, THUESE

cts of each

hip Qualities

- Establishe

age and com

Growth - M

as that may

onal life.

ings tasks rder through

cisive, quick done, focu

etails. Have

o also. Force

nd coopera

establish it

oyal, follow ay lives and

ey contribut

responsible.ential in eve

dual and gro

others in a

readily. Qu

plement co planning a

knowledge

RELATED W

by the MBT

es has dete

EN, J. M. &

type: Work

s, Team Spi

es order du

mplete tasks

Must learn t

y violate tra

to completihout the gro

kly move to s on getting

e a clear set

eful in imple

ative. Want

. Like to w

through evd try to pro

te.

Highly atturyone, want

oup growth.

a group, an

uickly see ill

mprehensivand goal s

e and pass

WITH

TI ® it can

ermined inhe

& RUTLEGE

kplace Cont

rit and sugg

utifully and

s on time an

that both o

adition - ca

ion efficientoup or organ

implement dg results in

of logical s

ementing the

t harmony

work with

ven in smalovide it. Wa

ned to the et to help ot

. Loyal, resp

nd provide

ogical and

ve systems setting. Usu

sing it on t

be proven

erent easine

E, H. (2002)

tribution, Pa

gested PM.

steadily an

nd under bud

organizationa

n play pow

tly and dutifnization.

decisions. the most

standards,

eir plans.

in their

others to

l matters. ant to be

emotions, thers fulfill

ponsive to

inspiring

inefficient

to solve ually well

to others.

that in an

esses and

), can be

athway to

Jobs.

nd works

dget.

al change

werful and

fully while

7/12

→ Teacom

indi

→ Sug

indi

ISFJ

→ Wo

det

→ Patcha

nee

→ Lea

det

→ Tea

thatorg

→ Sug

gen

INFJ

→ Wo

seri

→ Pat

futu

ben

→ Lea

modev

→ Tea

car

→ Sug

wor

INTJ

→ Wo

clar

imp

→ Pat

brin

bro

am Spirit - Tmplete proj

ividuals whe

ggested PM

ividual and i

orkplace Con

ail from beh

thway to Proanging situa

eds.

adership Qu

ail control a

am Spirit -

t are yet ananization an

ggested PM

neration.

orkplace Co

ious focus -

thway to Pro

ure and the

neath a serio

adership Qu

ralistic or velopment.

am Spirit - T

e and that,

ggested PM

rk well with

orkplace Co

rity, vision,

provement.

thway to Pro

ngs with it u

ought on by

Teams, if wects, but t

en the team

M Job - fin

solated task

ntribution -

hind the sce

ofessional Gations—-this

ualities - Pr

and tends to

Teams are

nother arenand its people

M Job – on

ontribution -

- inspiration

ofessional G

possibilities

ous exterior

ualities - P

values-relat

Teams are c

if well mana

M Job - idea

complex sit

ontribution

and stra

ofessional G

untold deta

visionary ch

well managethe importa

meetings a

nancial wo

ks.

Offers quiet

nes.

Growth - Mus flexibility c

oduces res

o perform tas

worthwhile

a in which toe.

ne to one re

- Turns wo

and devotio

Growth - Mu

s it holds fo

.

Provides ins

ted spin, w

complex hu

aged, can pr

a inspiration

tuations.

- Provides

ategic think

Growth - Mu

ils to which

hange are re

ed, are a goant work th

are over.

rk, controlli

t support, a

ust learn to can often b

sults throug

sks oneself

e work units

o provide q

elationship,

ork into a

on througho

ust learn that

or people is

spirational

working wi

man system

roduce insp

n, visionary t

organizatio

king white

ust learn tha

h someone

eal and pain

ood way to hat is done

ing, technic

sense of or

be open to be the sup

h one-on-o

rather than

s, vital and

uiet, unassu

tasks with

cause and

out the organ

t his or her e

often overlo

and visiona

th focus t

ms that nee

pirational, va

tasks and p

ons and gr

driving to

at each idea

will need to

ful.

distribute te is carried

cal problem

rder, and at

new possibpport someo

one relations

delegate.

important s

uming supp

no delega

injects—w

nization.

excitement

ooked, burie

ary directio

toward cha

d understan

aluable work

project man

roups with

oward cha

a for visionar

o tend - the

tasks and d out by

m solving,

ttention to

bilities and one most

ships and

structures

port to the

ation, idea

with quiet,

about the

ed as it is

n with a

ange and

nding and

k.

nagement,

objective

ange and

ry change

e stresses

8/12

→ Leaand

dec

→ Tea

and

to f

→ Sugwith

ISTP

→ Wo

calm

→ Pat

rela

→ Lea

neeof o

→ Tea

wor

→ Sug

task

ISFP

→ Wo

ano

→ Pat

pro

rootod

→ Lea

gen

→ Tea

and

→ Sug

rew

INFP

→ Wo

indi

org

→ Patthe

adership Qud shepherd

cisiveness a

am Spirit - T

d managed,

fruition.

ggested PMh uncertaint

orkplace Co

m, clear-thin

thway to Pr

ationships de

adership Qu

eds of the shothers.

am Spirit - T

rk, work tha

ggested PM

ks, work we

orkplace Con

onymous – a

thway to P

oblems beyo

ot issues anay.

adership Qu

ntle; unassu

am Spirit - T

d intrusive; q

ggested PM

ward, quiet s

orkplace Con

ividual, grou

anizations a

thway to Pr moment.

ualities - Dras individual

nd fairness.

Teams are p

can play a

M Job - straty, group org

ontribution -

nking resolv

ofessional G

eserves con

ualities - Set

hort term, u

Teams are o

at is best do

M Job - conf

ell alone, pra

ntribution -

attention to

rofessional

ond immedia

d not to ge

ualities - Lea

ming suppo

Teams are fi

quiet suppo

M Job - hid

support.

ntribution -

up, and orga

and teams.

rofessional G

aws energyls and grou

powerful and

pivotal role

ategic probganization.

- Solves pro

ve.

Growth - M

nsideration a

s an examp

unencumber

often an irrita

one alone.

flict resolutio

actical and d

Support pe

details and

Growth -

ate concern

et lost in the

ads by exam

ort.

ne and can

rt and dilige

dden projec

Holds and

anizational id

Growth - M

y from the cups through

d complicate

e in bringing

blem-solving

oblems pra

ust learn th

and offers n

ple to act ind

red by tradit

ation and a d

on with calm

direct projec

eople and th

action in the

Must learn

n - to look f

e foregroun

mple-by tend

be fun, thro

ent works ar

ct tasks, tas

protects the

dentities —o

Must learn to

complexity h uncertain

ed systems

a group or

, able to w

actically and

at the comp

o quick fix.

dependently

tion, proced

diversion fro

m and cont

ct tasks.

heir efforts w

e moment.

to focus o

for and con

nd, solving o

ding to task

ough they ar

e what mak

sks that mu

e values wit

often servin

o face confl

of future poty and cha

that, if well

r organizatio

work with de

d immediate

plexity of pe

y and to atte

dure, or the

om effective

rol, immedia

with a gentle

on the patt

front the sy

only the pro

details and

re personall

ke teams eff

ust be don

thin which a

g as moral

ict and con

ossibilities ange with

designed

on’s vision

etails and

ely with a

eople and

end to the

demands

, practical

ate action

e – almost

terns and

ystemic or

oblems of

providing

y draining

fective.

e without

are rooted

ballast for

nfront it in

9/12

→ Leacon

they

→ Tea

wor

→ Sug

INTP

→ Wo

solvorg

→ Pat

com

ado

→ Lea

and

→ Tea

to c

don

→ Sug

solv

ESTP

→ Wo

vari

→ Pat

be

futu

→ Lea

resp

the

→ Tea

or i

→ Sug

trad

ESFP

→ Wo

peo

→ Pat

stre

adership Qntrolling task

y are being

am Spirit -

rking togeth

ggested PM

orkplace Con

ve and reanizational c

thway to

mmunicating

opted and e

adership Qu

d allows oth

am Spirit - A

contribute i

ne in isolatio

ggested PM

ving, technic

orkplace Co

iables, and d

thway to Pr

aware that

ure possibilit

adership Qu

ponsive to t

name of ex

am Spirit - T

n dull meeti

ggested PM

dition.

orkplace Co

ople and act

thway to Pr

essful, and e

ualities - Aks and peo

controlled a

Though te

her to pool r

M Job – team

ntribution -

einvent, an change and

Profession

g with othe

enacted thro

ualities - Cre

ers to follow

A team is ok

n their own

on.

M Job – va

cal project jo

ntribution -

delivers wha

ofessional G

others may

ties.

ualities - Kee

the unexpec

xpediency.

Teams can b

ngs, they ca

M Job – wo

ntribution -

tions moving

rofessional

even hostile

Appeals to ple in such

at all.

eamwork is

esources an

m support, in

Uses clever

nd in an d improveme

al Growth

r people is

ough person

eates and w

w at their ow

kay if it allow

n way – but

alorize each

ob, financia

Goes with

at needs to

Growth - M

y find comfo

eps oneself

cted and ab

be fun; how

an run agrou

ork well with

Provides h

g in positive

Growth - M

moments o

values thr a way that

s difficult a

nd ideas is v

ntuitive jobs

rness and in

easygoingent.

- Must

important –

nal relationsh

works towar

wn pace and

ws members

t the best v

contributio

l control.

the flow, ad

be delivered

ust learn to

ort in struct

and others

bandoning r

wever, witho

und.

h unpredict

high-spirited

e ways.

Must learn t

of work life is

rough pers those conc

and draining

valuable and

s, team mora

ndependent

g unassum

learn tha

– great solu

hips.

rd a vision a

d ability.

s to enter on

visioning an

on in a team

dapts to the

d.

o be patient

ure, rules, a

on their toe

rules of hiera

ut constant

table job, w

d energy tha

to stretch t

s not always

sonal relatiocerned do n

g, collabora

d motivating

al ballast.

thinking to

ming manne

at connect

utions and

and a bette

n their own t

d problem

m, isolated

e unexpecte

with routine

and contem

es by being

archy and tr

action and

without hiera

at keeps a

to face the

s a barrel of

onships - not notice

ating and

g.

problem-

er prods

ting and

ideas are

er solution

terms and

solving is

problem-

ed, allows

es and to

mplation of

open and

radition in

variation,

archy and

variety of

negative,

f fun.

10/12

→ Leathat

→ Tea

wor

→ Sug

glob

ENFP

→ Wo

ent

→ Pat

com

swi

→ Lea

task

→ Teaand

→ Sug

lead

ENTP

→ Wo

chaare

→ Pat

and

mo

→ Lea

and

con

→ Tea

test

→ Sug

from

ESTJ

→ Wo

a ta

→ Pat

liste

→ Leaacc

adership Qut can be hig

am Spirit - T

rld’s a team

ggested PM

bal project m

orkplace Co

husiasm, an

thway to

mmitments

ngs can frus

adership Qu

ks and to de

am Spirit - Td tight time l

ggested PM

der that beli

orkplace Co

allenged, an accomplish

thway to Pro

d completion

od swings c

adership Qu

d even tak

ntribution to

am Spirit - T

ting ideas, d

ggested PM

m opposing

orkplace Con

ask, and to c

thway to P

ening to and

adership Qcomplish a t

ualities - Hasghly motivati

Teamwork

m, and only g

M Job – div

managemen

ontribution

nd unyieldin

Professiona

through to

strate and c

ualities - M

evelop both

Teams are fu lines can be

M Job – tea

eve that wo

ontribution -

nd reconfiguhed.

ofessional G

n - even wh

can send m

ualities - Em

king an op

the end res

Teams are

discussing d

M Job – ch

points of vi

ntribution -

complete it

Professional

d allowing al

ualities - Task, and tel

s a personaling to others

is the best

good can co

verse cultur

nt.

- Motivat

g attention t

al Growth

completion

confuse thos

Motivates, in

h personally

un and enee avoided.

am motivato

ork together

- Regards t

ured so that

Growth - Mu

hen one dee

ixed signals

powers one

posing poi

sult.

one more i

differences,

ange mana

ew.

Drives to ta

with dispatc

Growth -

lternative vie

Takes challs it like it is

l and often ps.

way to app

ome from su

ral team m

tes and in

to personal

- Must l

n and to be

se with who

spires, and

and profess

rgizing – es

or, group p

is the best

the workpla

t learning is

ust learn to

ems them bo

s.

eself and oth

nt of view

mportant ve

and collabo

agement, ch

ake charge,

ch and skill.

Must learn

ewpoints.

arge, dema.

playful go-w

proach any

uch joined e

anager, gro

nvigorates

relationship

learn to f

e aware tha

om he or she

d cajoles pe

sionally.

pecially whe

problem-solv

work.

ace as a sy

s constant a

focus ener

oring and to

hers by cha

to enhanc

ehicle for ea

orating on re

hange leade

to see the p

n to be les

nds 1oyalt

with-the-mom

endeavor;

efforts.

oup problem

thought in

ps.

ollow proje

at one’s wi

e works.

eople to ac

en conflict,

ving, optimi

ystem to be

and worthw

rgy on follow

o remember

allenging, co

ce each in

arning - an

esults.

er, conflict

practical fac

ss hard-cha

ty, pushes

ment style

the entire

m-solving,

nspiration,

ects and

ide mood

ccomplish

hierarchy,

stic team

e moved,

while tasks

w-through

that wide

onfronting,

ndividual’s

arena for

resolution

cilitation of

arging by

hard to

11/12

→ Teaare

→ Sug

role

ESFJ

→ Wo

per

→ Pat

to b

→ Lea

gen

→ Tea

disa

→ Sug

task

ENFJ

→ Wo

har

→ Pat

and

→ Leaby n

→ Tea

the

→ Sug

rela

ENTJ

→ Wo

intetow

→ Pat

at t

→ Lea

eve

→ Teainvo

slow

→ Sug

ma

am Spirit - T well manag

ggested PM

e manageme

orkplace Co

rsonal achiev

thway to Pr

be expresse

adership Qu

ntle nudge to

am Spirit - T

agreements

ggested PM

ks, do not a

orkplace Co

rmoniously f

thway to Pro

d that disagr

adership Qu nurturing re

am Spirit -

me of toget

ggested PM

ationships, c

orkplace Co

ellectually insward its fulfill

thway to Pro

heir own pa

adership Qu

eryone to ge

am Spirit - olvement - a

w or water d

ggested PM

nager.

Teams are aged and peo

M Job – pra

ent, executi

ontribution

vement and

rofessional G

ed, and reco

ualities - Pro

oward task

Teams are g

s should not

M Job – ha

accept intole

ontribution

or the comm

ofessional G

reements ar

ualities - Emlationships a

Teams are

therness driv

M Job – po

conflict reso

ontribution

spires and cment with d

ofessional G

ace and leve

ualities - Is ta

et on board

Teams caas long as t

down the vis

M Job – in

an effective tople’s roles

actical team

on manage

- Builds a

d task accom

Growth - M

ognize that c

ojects inspir

completion

good and c

be tolerate

armonious t

erances from

- Persona

mon good.

Growth - Mu

re not perso

mpowers oth and making

good, peop

ves the task

ositive team

lution from t

- Through

challenges edispatch.

Growth - Mu

el of commit

ask-driven a

and move to

an be good the task is c

sion.

ntuitive tea

tool for acco and goals a

m manager,

r.

a harmonio

mplishment.

ust learn to

conflict is no

ation and g

.

an be prod

d.

team mana

m the team

ally inspires

ust learn th

onal attacks

hers to acco personal ap

ple are goo

k.

m leader, o

team memb

h hard-cha

everyone to

ust learn to

tment.

and demand

oward achie

d and do completed a

am leader,

omplishing tare defined.

quick answ

ous environ

.

o accept diff

ot always de

graciousness

uctive; how

ger, good

members.

s and mo

at not all sit

.

omplish whppeals.

od, and wor

ptimistic po

bers.

arging argu

experience

allow time f

ding, with a

eving the go

provide op and the gro

intellectual

tasks as lon

wer problem

ment that

ferences, al

estructive.

s with a con

wever, argum

supporting

tivates all

tuations nee

at needs to

rk is good

oint of view

uments and

a vision and

for others to

a motivationa

oal.

portunities oup’s proces

leader, tas

ng as they

m-solving,

supports

llow them

nstant yet

ments and

individual

to work

ed rescue

o be done

when the

w, nurture

d action,

d to move

o develop

al spin for

for more ss do not

sk driven

12/12

CONCLUS

The aim of

accomplish

With the al

represent,

facilitating t

a better orhuman res

complemen

REFEREN

FLANES, S

Manageme

GEYER, P

http://mem

KROEGER16 Persona

MYERS, I.

Gente.

MYERS, I.

Psychologi

PMI (2004

Newton Sq

QUENK, N

Alto: Consu

VARGAS,

Developme

Global Con

VERMA, V

Darby: Proj

SIONS

this article i

h a judicious

llocation of

the probab

the develop

r worse typsources se

nt MBTI® in

NCES

S. W. & L

ent Concept

. (2000) Th

mbers.ozema

, O, THUESality Types D

B. & MYER

B. (1995). I

sts Press.

4). A guide

quare: Proje

. L.(2000) In

ulting Psych

R. V. (20

ent Factor a

ngress EMEA

V. K. (1995)

ject Manage

is to associa

s and well-s

the psycho

bility of turn

pment of the

pe. All typeselection, se

n the adequa

LEVIN, G. (

ts.

he MBTI©

ail.com.au/~

SEN, J. M. &Determine Y

RS, P. B. (1

Introdução

to the Pro

ct Managem

n the Grip: U

hologists Pre

004). Using

and a Comp

A.

. Human R

ement Instit

ate the theo

succeeded

ological type

n-over is red

e team. Fina

s have stroeveral othe

ate selectio

(2001). Peo

and its use

~alchymia/lib

& RUTLEGEYour Succes

997). Ser H

à Teoria do

oject Manag

ment Institut

Understand

ess.

g Earned V

pensation T

Resource Sk

ute.

ory proposed

human res

es that are a

duced, thus

ally, it is imp

ng and wer factors,

n and alloca

ople Skills

e in Organi

brary/mbtio

E, H. (2002)ss on the Jo

Humano é S

os Tipos Psi

gement Bo

te.

ding Type, S

Value Mana

Tool. Prague

kills for the

d by C. G. J

ources sele

aligned to th

s increasing

portant to st

eak featuresdynamics

ation of the

for Project

izations: An

rg.html.

. Type Talk

b. New Yor

Ser Diferente

icológicos.

ody of Know

Stress and In

agement In

e: Project M

Project Ma

Jung and th

ection for th

he functions

g the motiva

tress that th

s, and, in a and proce

project’s res

t Managers

n Overview.

at Work: H

k: Dell Publi

e. São Paulo

Palo Alto: C

wledge. 3rd

nferior Func

ndexes as

Managemen

anager vol.

he need to

e project.

s they will

ation and

here is not

project’s esses will

sources.

s. Vienna:

. Website

How to the

ishing.

o: Editora

Consulting

d Edition.

ction. Palo

a Team

nt Institute

2. Upper