sociedade brasileira da ciência das plantas daninhas...
TRANSCRIPT
1. Comunicações da SBCPD ................. 2
1.1 Últimos trabalhos publicados na revista Planta Daninha
1.2 Últimos trabalhos publicados na Revista Brasileira de Herbicidas
Leia mais...
2. Notícias, informações e opiniões ... 5
2.1 LAUREADOS 2018 - Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência
das Plantas Daninhas
2.2 Prêmio Melhor Artigo Planta Daninha (Período 2016-2018)
2.3 Prêmio Melhor Artigo Revista Brasileira de Herbicidas (Período 2016-2018)
2.4 LAUREADOS 2018 - XXXI Congresso Brasileiro da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas, Riocentro, Rio de Janeiro – RJ
2.5 XXXI CBCPD
2.6 V CONBRAF - Congresso Brasileiro de Fitossanidade
2.7 Trabalho premiado no VIII Congresso Brasileiro de Soja
Leia mais...
3. Comunicações técnicas............................................................................................ 14
3.1 Dissertação de mestrado
Leia mais...
4. Resumos de artigos científicos publicados em periódicos não vinculados a SBCPD ............................ 15 Alguns dos trabalhos: - Properties of the enzyme acetolactate synthase in herbicide resistant canola
Leia mais...
5. Títulos de artigos científicos publicados em periódicos internacionais especializados ...................................... 18 - Invasive Plant Science and Managament - Weed Biology and Management - Weed Science - Weed Research - Weed Technology
Leia mais...
6. Publicações ...................................... 35
Guia de Herbicidas, 7ª edição
Leia mais...
7. Calendário de eventos ..................... 36
Leia mais...
8. Nota do editor.................................... 37
VOLUME 27 N° 3 ANO 2018 ISSN 1679-0901
Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas
BOLETIM INFORMATIVO
S B C P D
2
1 – COMUNICAÇÕES DA SBCPD
1.1 Últimos trabalhos publicados na revista Planta Daninha Volume 36, 2018 Initial development of eucalyptus according to different desiccation periods of signalgrass GRAAT, Y.; BACHA, A.L.; NEPOMUCENO, M.P.; ALVES, P.L.C.A. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0100-83582018360100020
Sugarcane seedlings influenced by the management with herbicides SILVA, T.P.; AZANIA, C.A.M.; XAVIER, M.A.; PERECIN, D.; VITORINO, R. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0100-83582018360100019
Phenological sensitivity of two maize cultivars to trinexapac-ethyl MENDES FAGHERAZZI, M.; SOUZA, C.A.; STEFEN, D.L.V.; ZANESCO, P.R.; JUNKES, G.V.; COELHO, C.M.M.; SANGOI, L. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0100-83582018360100012
Performance of crops grown in succession to soybeans treated with different residual herbicides SOUSA, J.B.; TEIXEIRA, M.B.; JAKELAITIS, A.; CUNHA, F.N.; SILVA, N.F. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0100-83582018360100011
Physiological performance of seeds and level of herbicide residues depending on application of 2,4-D in wheat AISENBERG, G.R.; WESTENDORFF, N.R.; LANGARO, A.C.; VARGAS, L.; AGOSTINETTO, D. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0100-83582018360100002
Interference of GR® volunteer corn population and origin on soybean grain yield losses PIASECKI, C.; RIZZARDI, M.A.; SCHWADE, D.P.; TRES, M.; SARTORI, J. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0100-83582018360100003
Sticky nightshade infestation and dispersion on an integrated soybean-eucalyptus system at subtropical Brazil DEISS, L.; MORAES, A.; PELISSARI, A.; PORFÍRIO DA SILVA, V.; DOMINSCHEK, R. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0100-83582018360100017
Weeds interference in pequi plants MARTINS, D.A.; JAKELAITIS, A.; COSTA, A.C.; ALMEIDA, G.M.A.; SILVA FILHO, R.O. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0100-83582018360100004
Comparison of sensitivity to glyphosate of Euphorbia davidii populations NÚÑEZ FRÉ, F.R.; JUAN, V.F.; YANNICCARI, M.; SAINT ANDRÉ, H.M.; FERNANDEZ, R.R. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0100-83582018360100005
3
Intoxication and physiological aspects of forage plants and weeds submitted to clomazone atmospheric waste SILVA, M.M.; SANTOS, J.B.; SANTOS, E.A.; SANTOS, M.V.; SARDINHA, L.T.; RIBEIRO, V.H.V. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0100-83582018360100006
The role of plant growth regulators in the development of in vitro flowering, histology and ultrastructural studies in Impatiens balsamina cv. Dwarf Bush MOHAMED, N.; TAHA, R.M.; RAZAK, U.N.A.A.; ELIAS, H. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0100-83582018360100013
Associations between herbicides and glyphosate in agronomic performance of RR2 Intact soybean CESCO, V.J.S.; ALBRECHT, A.J.P.; RODRIGUES, D.M.; KRENCHINSKI, F.H.; ALBRECHT, L.P. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0100-83582018360100015
Patterns of reproductive and seed dispersal and ecological significance of the clonal spring ephemeroid plant Carex physodes in the Gurbantuggut desert ABUDUREHEMAN, B.; CHEN, Y.; LI, X.; ZHANG, L.; LIU, H.; ZHANG, D.; GUAN, K. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0100-83582018360100007
Bioherbicidal assessment of aqueous extracts of mesquite (Prosopis juliflora) on weeds control and growth, yield and quality of wheat SHAH, R.H.; BALOCH, M.S.; KHAN, A.A.; IJAZ, M.; ZUBAIR, M. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0100-83582018360100014
Seed pre-treatment and planting geometry positively influence herbicide efficacy in wheat (Triticum aestivum) ULLAH, A.; KHALIQ, A.; RIAZ, A.; NOOR, M.A.; FIAZ, S.; WAQAS, M.A.; ZAIN, M.; ASHRAF, U.; NAWAZ, A. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0100-83582018360100008
Biological management of basal rot of onion by Trichoderma harzianum and Withania somnifera AKHTAR, R.; JAVAID, A. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0100-83582018360100009
Herbicidal potential of dryland plants on growth and tuber sproutingin purple nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus) IQBAL, J.; ZAHRA, S.T.; AHMAD, M.; SHAH, A.N.; HASSAN, W. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0100-83582018360100001
Morphometry and germination of Passovia pyrifolia, Struthanthus marginatus and Phoradendron mucronatum diaspores AZEVEDO, J.M.L.; SANTOS, C.G.G.; CAIRES, C.S.; ARAÚJO NETO, J.C.; SOUZA, R.C http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0100-83582018360100010
Does the interference of GR® volunteer corn alters stress metabolism on soybean? PIASECKI, C.; RIZZARDI, M.A.; SCHONS, J.; CAVERZAN, A.; CHAVARRIA, G. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0100-83582018360100018
4
1.2 Últimos trabalhos publicados na Revista Brasileira de Herbicidas Volume 17, número 2, 2018
Manejo de plantas daninhas Manejo químico de Urochloa ruziziensis consorciado com soja na savana de Roraima RODRIGUES, G.S.; MEDEIROS, R.D.; ALBUQUERQUE, J.A.A.; SMIDERLE, O.J.; ALVES, J.M.A.; SILVA, A.A. https://doi.org/10.7824/rbh.v17i2.581
Sistemas de manejo de plantas daninhas utilizando o novo herbicida pyroxasulfone visando ao controle químico de gramíneas em soja MOROTA, F.K.; MATTE, W.D.; OLIVEIRA JÚNIOR, R.S.; BIFFE, D.F.; FRANCHINI, L.H.M.; CONSTANTIN, J. https://doi.org/10.7824/rbh.v17i2.584
Eficácia de herbicidas isolados ou em mistura no controle da planta exótica invasora Urochloa subquadripara CHIAROTTI, L.F.; PEREIRA, P.C.; SCANNAVINO, R.H.C.P.; CASTRO, K.S.; CERVEIRA JÚNIOR, W.R.; CRUZ, C. https://doi.org/10.7824/rbh.v17i2.596
Resposta no controle de capim-amargoso a mistura de tanque de glyphosate e haloxifope com auxinas sintéticas PEREIRA, G.R.; ZOBIOLE, L.H.S.; ROSSI, C.V.S. https://doi.org/10.7824/rbh.v17i2.606
Eficácia de [atrazine + mesotrione] para o controle de plantas daninhas na cultura do milho MATTE, W.D.; OLIVEIRA JÚNIOR, R.S.; MACHADO, F.G.; CONSTANTIN, J.; BIFFE, D.F.; GUTIERREZ, F.S.D.; SILVA, J.R.V. https://doi.org/10.7824/rbh.v17i2.587
Seletividade de herbicidas a espécies cultivadas Tolerância da cebola implantada por semeadura direta ao flumioxazin aplicado em pós-emergência inicial OLIVEIRA, M.G.; DIAS, R.C.; MELO, C.A.D.; MENDES, K.F.; SILVA, P.V.; SILVA, D.V.; REIS, M.R. https://doi.org/10.7824/rbh.v17i2.585 Dinâmica de herbicidas no ambiente Persistência de imazethapyr no solo e toxicidade ao milho semeado em sucessão CARVALHO, S.J.P.; SOARES, D.J.; LÓPEZ-OVEJERO, R.F.; CHRISTOFFOLETI, P.J. https://doi.org/10.7824/rbh.v17i2.583
Volta ao índice
5
2 – NOTÍCIAS, INFORMAÇÕES E OPINIÕES
2.1 LAUREADOS 2018 - Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas Prêmio Destaque na Pós-graduação Ana Claudia Langaro Prêmio Destaque Jovem Pesquisador Daniel Valadão Silva Prêmio Destaque Extensão Robinson Osipe Prêmio Destaque Pesquisa Dirceu Agostinetto Prêmio Destaque Ensino Nelson Diehl Kruse Prêmio Destaque Indústria Caio Vitagliano Santi Rossi Sócio Honorário da SBCPD Benedito Noedi Rodrigues 2.2 Prêmio Melhor Artigo Planta Daninha (Período 2016-2018) Takano, H. K.; Oliveira Júnior, R. S.; Constantin, J.; Braz, G.; Gheno, E. A. (2017). Goosegrass resistant to glyphosate in Brazil. Planta Daninha, 35, e017163071. https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0100-83582017350100013 2.3 Prêmio Melhor Artigo Revista Brasileira de Herbicidas (Período 2016-2018) Schreiber, F.; Ávila, L. A.; Scherner, A.; Moura, D. S.; Martini, A. T. (2016). Volatilidade de formulações de clomazone em condições de campo. Revista Brasileira de Herbicidas, 15(3), 271-280. http://dx.doi.org/10.7824/rbh.v15i3.475
6
2.4 LAUREADOS 2018 - XXXI Congresso Brasileiro da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas, Riocentro, Rio de Janeiro – RJ Pôsteres: Categoria Graduação – Destaques
SENSIBILIDADE DE PAU-JACARÉ AO HERBICIDA TRIFLURALIN Santos, Naiane Maria Corrêa dos¹; Amaral, Wander Gladson¹; Araújo, Fillipe
Vieira¹; Costa, Vitor Antunes Martins da¹; Jesus, Natielle Aparecida Campos de¹; Sincurá, Yowdirllan Ribeiro¹; Santos, José Barbosa dos¹
¹Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri – UFVJM, Diamantina, MG, [email protected], Brasil.
O controle químico de espécies competidoras em áreas de reflorestamento
tornou-se uma técnica dominante. Todavia, a sensibilidade de espécies florestais a
herbicidas é pouco conhecida. O objetivo do trabalho foi avaliar a sensibilidade de
Piptadenia gonoacantha (pau-jacaré) ao trifluralin, em desenvolvimento inicial,
visando investigar o potencial de uso desse herbicida em programas de restauração
de áreas degradadas com predominância de gramíneas infestantes.
Piptadenia gonoacantha se recuperou da intoxicação pelo trifluralin, com crescimento
satisfatório. Esse herbicida apresenta potencial para controle de gramíneas infestantes em programas de restauração de áreas degradadas com essa espécie florestal.
Barroso, Gabriela Madureira¹; Morandi, Daniela Torres¹; Marques Rocha,
Tamara Kelly Nunes¹; Santos, Douglas Adriano¹; Oliveira, Ivani Teixeira de¹; Santos,
José Barbosa dos¹ ¹Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri – MG – [email protected] – BR
Introdução A fixação biológica, feita por bactérias simbiontes de Leguminosas, é a
principal fonte de nitrogênio para a manutenção da vida na Terra. Porém, esse
processo pode ser afetado pela utilização de herbicidas em áreas agrícolas
próximas às áreas de florestas nativas. Objetivou-se avaliar a sensibilidade in
vitro de bactérias do gênero Bradyrhizobium sp. a herbicidas.
O herbicida glyphosate ocasionou diminuição do crescimento bacteriano ao longo do tempo. Bradyrhizobium sp. mostrou-se sensível à presença do sulfentrazone e diuron, que ocasionaram menor número de bactérias no final da avaliação.
Agradecimentos:
Agradecimentos:
7
8
Pôsteres: Categoria Graduação – Campeão
NO INÍCIO DA COMPETIÇÃO
Apresentadora Campeã, Josiane Costa Maciel, recebendo homenagem das
mãos do Dr. Marcelo Nicolai
9
Pôsteres: Categoria Pós-Graduação – Destaques
10
Pôsteres: Categoria Pós-Graduação – Campeão
Apresentação Oral: Pesquisa Aplicada – Destaques Resistência múltipla de Conyza sumatrensis a três mecanismos de ação de herbicidas Vinícius Gabriel Caneppele Pereira Espectro de gotas gerado em diferentes pressões por pontas com indução de ar na pulverização de caldas contendo associações de glifosato com diferentes formulações de dicamba Raquel Berna Influence of growth stage on efficacy, absorption and translocation of glyphosate in “Eragrostis plana” Marlon Ouriques Bastiani Aplicação de amônio glufosinate como agente de desrama precoce em plantas de eucalipto Renato Nunes Costa Apresentação Oral: Pesquisa Aplicada – Campeão Resistência cruzada negativa a clomazone em capim-arroz resistente às imidazolinonas Luan Cutti
11
Apresentação Oral: Inovação – Destaques Novos diterpenoides fitotóxicos do capim-annoni Adriana Favaretto Análise de transcriptoma para avaliação do mecanismo de resistência do azevém ao herbicida glyphosate Joanei Cechim The mechanism of action of glufosinate: why is inhibition of glutamine synthetase toxic to plants? Hudson K. Takano Controle seletivo de capim-annoni através do equipamento de aplicação Campo Limpo Mateus Gallon Apresentação Oral: Inovação – Campeão Regulação epigenética e síntese de flavonoides apresentam envolvimento com a tolerância ao herbicida imazethapyr Catarine Markus 2.5 XXXI CBCPD
De 27 a 31 de agosto de 2018, realizou-se o XXXI Congresso Brasileiro da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas, no RioCentro – Rio de Janeiro. O evento foi organizado conjuntamente pela Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro – UFRRJ, Escola Superior de Agricultura “Luiz de Queiroz”- ESALQ/USP, Universidade Federal de São Carlos – UFSCar, Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho” – UNESP, Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri – UFVJM, Universidade Federal de Pelotas UFPel, Instituto Federal do Sul de Minas Gerais – IFSULDEMINAS e AGROCON.
Durante cinco dias, a cidade do Rio de Janeiro foi o cenário para aprimoramento dos principais caminhos a serem seguidos por produtores, empresários e cientistas da área da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas. O tema central do evento foi DESAFIOS E SUSTENTABILIDADE NO MANEJO DE PLANTAS DANINHAS e contou com a participação de 802 inscritos, 68 palestrantes, 47 instituições, 72 apresentações orais e 548 pôsteres.
Deixamos nosso agradecimento a colaboração dos nossos patrocinadores, que tornam possível a realização deste evento. Patrocinadores Diamante: Bayer, Corteva Agriscience Divisão Agrícola Dow Dupont, Plataforma Intacta 2 Xtend e Syngenta; Patrocinadores Ouro: BASF, FMC e Nufarm. Patrocinadores Prata: Arysta LifeScience, UPL e Xarvio Digital Farming Company. Patrocinador Bronze: Ihara. Além disto, contamos com o apoio do Hrac-BR, ANDEF, CNPq e CAPES e organização da Activia Conference and Corporate Travel responsável por toda a logística deste evento.
Camila Ferreira de Pinho Presidente do XXXI CBCPD
12
ANAIS do XXXI CBCPD disponíveis para acesso, em breve também estará disponível a versão com ISSN.
2.6 V CONBRAF - Congresso Brasileiro de Fitossanidade O V CONBRAF acontecerá de 7 a 9 de agosto de 2019 no Centro de Eventos da Fiep, em Curitiba - PR, com o tema Desafios e Avanços da Fitossanidade, uma rica oportunidade para a discussão sobre as necessidades e demandas do setor. O evento será composto por plenárias, sessões e mesas redondas, além de contar com a apresentação de trabalhos na forma de pôsteres e apresentações orais (prepare o seu resumo !!).
Maiores informações podem ser encontradas no facebook do evento (V CONBRAF). Empresas que se interessarem em colaborar com o evento, ou maiores informações, entrar em contato pelo e-mail [email protected].
13
2.7 Trabalho premiado no VIII Congresso Brasileiro de Soja O trabalho “Monitoramento de buva com indicativo de resistência a paraquat em áreas de produção de soja” (Albrecht, A.J.P.; Albrecht, L.P.; Pellizzaro, E.C.; Lorenzetti, J.B.; Danilussi, M.T.Y.) foi premiado como o melhor na categoria profissional no VIII Congresso Brasileiro de Soja, realizado em Goiânia – GO. Os anais com esse e todos os demais trabalhos estão disponíveis online.
Volta ao índice
14
3 – COMUNICAÇÕES TÉCNICAS
3.1 Dissertação de Mestrado GLUFOSINATE E ASSOCIAÇÕES COM HERBICIDAS EM TECNOLOGIAS DE MILHO COM O GENE FOSFINOTRICINA ACETYLTRANSFERASE Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho” (Unesp), Faculdade de Ciências Agronômicas, Botucatu, São Paulo Autor: Fábio Henrique Krenchinski Orientador: Caio Antonio Carbonari Palavras-chave: gene pat; N-acetyl-L-glufosinate; L-fosfinotricina; produtividade de milho. Resumo: O gene fosfinotricina acetyltransferase (pat) produz a enzima PAT, que por n-acetilação é capaz de metabolizar o glufosinate, transformando-o em n-acetyl-L-glufosinate (NAG). Assim, plantas transgênicas contendo esse gene resistem às aplicações desse herbicida. No milho, esse gene foi inserido como marcador de seleção e mais estudos precisam ser realizados a fim de validar o uso dessa tecnologia. Nesse contexto, os objetivos do presente trabalho foram avaliar se a expressão do gene pat é proporcional ao nível de resistência de tecnologias de milho à aplicação de glufosinate e avaliar a seletividade de herbicidas em associação ao glufosinate em milho com o gene pat. Durante o primeiro trabalho, foram utilizados híbridos de milho com as tecnologias Herculex®; Agrisure TL®; Herculex Yieldgard®; Leptra®; Viptera 3®; Power Core® com o gene pat e VT PRO® sem o gene pat. Para isso, um experimento foi realizado para avaliar a expressão relativa do gene pat nos híbridos de milho, por meio de PCR em tempo real. Em outro estudo, foram aplicadas doses de glufosinate (0, 500, 1000, 2000 e 4000 g i.a ha-1) sobre os híbridos de milho, no qual foram avaliados os teores de glufosinate e NAG, assim como acúmulo de amônia, taxa de transporte de elétrons (ETR), injúria visual e acúmulo de biomassa. Em campo, foi realizada a aplicação de 500 g i.a ha-1 de glufosinate durante o estádio V4 do milho, e foi avaliado o rendimento de grãos. Um segundo estudo foi realizado a campo, adotando-se a tecnologia Power Core®, e os tratamentos foram: glufosinate; glyphosate; glufosinate + glyphosate; glufosinate + nicosulfuron; glufosinate + atrazine; glufosinate + tembotrione; glufosinate + mesotrione; glufosinate + carfentrazone ethyl; glufosinate + bentazon; glufosinate + 2,4-D; testemunha sem capina e testemunha capinada. As avaliações realizadas foram: injúria visual, ETR, quantificação de amônia, altura, rendimento de grãos, além de nota de controle visual de plantas daninhas. As tecnologias VT PRO®, Herculex®, Agrisure TL® e Viptera 3® apresentaram menor expressão do gene pat, e consequentemente menor teor de NAG, maiores teores de glufosinate e amônia, maior injúria visual, assim como maior redução em ETR e acúmulo de biomassa. O rendimento de grãos não foi afetado negativamente pela aplicação de 500 g i.a ha-1 em nenhum dos híbridos testados. Conclui-se que a expressão do gene pat é proporcional ao nível de resistência de cada tecnologia nos híbridos de milho. A adoção da aplicação de glufosinate em associação a outros herbicidas não proporcionou redução de produtividade no milho.
15
4 – RESUMOS DE ARTIGOS CIENTÍFICOS PUBLICADOS EM PERIÓDICOS NÃO VINCULADOS À SBCPD
Durigon, M. R.; Mariani, F.; Santos, F. M. D.; Vargas, L., & Chavarria, G. (2018). Properties of the enzyme acetolactate synthase in herbicide resistant canola. Bragantia, 77(3), 485-492. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-4499.2017159 Mutations in the gene that encodes the enzyme acetolactate synthase (ALS), conferring plant resistance to ALS inhibitor herbicides, can reduce or inhibit enzymatic function. The objective of this work was to determine the functionality and kinetic characteristics of the enzyme ALS and evaluate the action of the herbicides imazapic (imidazolinone) and metsulfuron-methyl (sulfonylurea) on the activity of the enzyme ALS in canola hybrid Hyola 571CL (imidazolinone resistant), compared to hybrids Hyola 555TT (triazine resistant) and Hyola 61 (conventional). The plants were grown in a greenhouse, and leaves were collected to perform ALS activity analysis. The concentration of pyruvate to provide initial velocity equal to half the maximum reaction rate (Km) and the maximum reaction rate (Vmax) was determined, as well as the enzyme’s activity in the presence of imazapic and metsulfuron-methyl inhibitors. There was no change in the Km and Vmax in the hybrid Hyola 571CL in relation to Hyola 61. The hybrid Hyola 555TT presented Vmax higher than the other hybrids. In the hybrid Hyola 571CL, the activity of ALS was reduced only by the application of metsulfuron-methyl, and the functionality of the enzyme did not change in relation to the other hybrids. The hybrid Hyola 571CL is resistant only to the imidazolinone group herbicide and this resistance does not cause adaptive cost in relation to the other hybrids. Keywords: Brassica napus L.; enzyme functionality; metsulfuron-methyl; imazapic Gallon, M.; Trezzi, M. M.; Diesel, F.; Possenti, J. C.; Batistel, S. C. (2018). Methods to promote Borreria latifolia seed germination. Revista Ciência Agronômica, 49(3), 475-483. http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/1806-6690.20180054 Specific knowledge on dormancy and germination patterns of weed species aids the development of integrated management strategies. This study aimed to evaluate and select effective methods for overcoming dormancy in B. latifolia seeds, as well as determining their influence on the germination process. A completely randomized experimental design was used, with four replications and 20 seeds per repetition. Seven tests were conducted, with the corresponding B. latifolia seed treatments: Test 1 - mechanical scarification, sulfuric acid, hot water and running water; Test 2 - pre-cooling at 4 °C and dry heat at 60 °C. Test 3 - gibberellic acid at concentrations of 0, 50, 100, 200 and 400 ppm; Test 4 - acetic acid and potassium nitrate 2%; Test 5 - dual combinations of the three best treatments observed in the first four tests. Test 6 - pre-soaking in a sandbox and in germination paper and; Test 7 - imbibition curve. The seeds were submitted to the germination test in BOD at 25 °C with a photoperiod of 12h, in transparent polypropylene boxes. Germination percentage (GP), mean germination time and relative frequency of germination were determined and the weight of the seeds after soaking in Test 7 was measured. The best treatments for overcoming seed dormancy were dry heat, gibberellic acid 283 ppm and KNO3 3h. The association of dry heat +
16
potassium nitrate 3 h and potassium nitrate 3 h +gibberellic acid increased germination percentage by 25% compared to isolated treatments. Keywords: Broadleaf buttonweed; overcoming; dormancy; soaking; Rubiaceae. Santiago, A. D.; Cavalcante, M. H. B., Braz, G. B. P., & Procópio, S. D. O. (2018). Efficacy and selectivity of herbicides applied in cassava pre-emergence. Revista Caatinga, 31(3), 640-650. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1983-21252018v31n312rc The interference imposed by weeds can cause damages to cassava development. Thus, adopting control measures is fundamental. The use of pre-emergence herbicides is one of the control alternatives, since cassava presents a good tolerance to herbicides applied in this modality. However, herbicides may present differential selectivity due to the variety of cassava that is planted. The objective of this study was to evaluate both weed control effectiveness and selectivity of different herbicide combinations applied at pre-emergence of two cassava varieties. Two experiments were established in the field using a randomized complete block design, in a split plot scheme, with four replications. In the efficacy experiment, application of six combinations of herbicides, including clomazone + ametryn, clomazone + metribuzin, clomazone + flumioxazin, isoxaflutole + ametryn, isoxaflutole + metribuzin, isoxaflutole + flumioxazin were evaluated in the main plot. In addition, a non-treated control and a weeded control were evaluated. In the subplots, the Caravela and Pretinha varieties were planted. For the selectivity experiment, a non-treated control was not included. The combinations containing clomazone presented a longer residual period of weed control as well as a better control of benghal dayflower. Metribuzin exhibited lower efficacy than other herbicide combinations containing clomazone or isoxaflutole. The Pretinha variety showed greater tolerance to weed interference. Every herbicide combination that was applied in cassava pre-emergence presented selectivity for both Caravela and Pretinha varieties. Keywords: Herbicides combinations; Manihot esculenta Crantz; weeds
Luz, J. M. Q.; Fonseca, L. F., & Duarte, I. N. (2018). Selectivity of pre-emergence herbicides in potato cv. Innovator. Horticultura Brasileira, 36(2), 223-228. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0102-053620180213 Herbicide tolerance differs among potato cultivars. Thus, pre-emergence herbicides in potatoes need to be studied. We evaluated weed control, selectivity and potato yield of cv. Innovator with the herbicides clomazone, metribuzin and linuron. The experimental design was randomized blocks with four replications. One experiment was installed in 2014 (experiment 1, 5 treatments) and another in 2015 (experiment 2, 7 treatments), irrigated by central pivot in Perdizes-MG, Brazil. In experiment 1 treatments consisted of a control (T1), a hoed control (T2), clomazone (360 g ha-1) (T3), metribuzin (480 g ha-1) (T4), and linuron (990 g ha-1) (T5). The treatments in experiment 2 repeated those in experiment 1 (T1 to T5) and added clomazone + metribuzin (360 + 480 g ha-1)) (T6), and clomazone + linuron (360 + 990 g ha-1) (T7). We determined the number of stems per meter, length of longest stems, phytotoxicity, weed control, soluble solids content (%), yield and classification of tubers. The herbicides, either by themselves or in
17
combination with another herbicide, provided 100% control of Eleusine indica and Digitaria horizontalis. Clomazone by itself or in combination with metribuzin or linuron provided the best control of Commelina benghalensis. Plots treated with clomazone presented phytotoxicity symptoms at 10 days after emergence (DAE); however, the plants recovered from these symptoms at 30 DAE. Metribuzin reduced soluble solids content, which affects industrial yield. The herbicides significantly influenced potato yield. In, 2014, the greatest “total” yields were observed in treatments with linuron (34.48 g ha-1) while the greatest “special” potato yields were achieved with clomazone (20.21 g ha-1) and linuron (21.13 g ha-1). In 2015, the greatest “total” yields were observed in treatments with clomazone [“special” (20.98 t ha-1) and “total” (35.11 t ha-1)] and metribuzin [“special” (20.85 t ha-1) and “total” (35.45 g ha-1)] followed by clomazone+linuron (30.95 g ha-1). Therefore, while metribuzin and linuron controlled Eleusine indica and Digitaria horizontalis, they may also reduce potato quality. Clomazone may be an option for controlling Eleusine indica, Digitaria horizontalis and Commelina benghalensis without affecting potato yield and soluble solids content. Keywords: Solanum tuberosum; yield; weed. Santos, N. M. C.; Costa, V. A. M.; Araújo, F. V.; Alencar, B. T. B.; Ribeiro, V. H. V.; Okumura, F. ... Santos, J. B. (2018). Phytoremediation of Brazilian tree species in soils contaminated by herbicides. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25(27), 27561-27568. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-2798-0 The phytoremediation potential of Brazilian trees species Calophyllum brasiliense, Eremanthus crotonoides, Hymenaea courbaril, Inga striata, and Protium heptaphyllum was investigated for contaminated soils containing ametryn and hexazinone. Visual injury, chlorophyll content, plant height, leaf temperature, leaf number, and water-efficient use were evaluated. Residual herbicides at soil substrates were analyzed by LC/MS. Among the species C. brasiliense and H. courbaril were tolerant to both herbicides. P. Heptaphyllum presented tolerance at ametryn treatment. E. crotonoides, I. striata, and P. heptaphyllum died in hexazinone treatment. A high content of residual ametryn was found for E. crotonoides. In ametryn treatment, residual herbicide has decreased for C. brasiliense and E. crotonoides species. C. brasiliense highlighted among others becoming a good agent for phytoremediation of soils contaminated with traces of ametryn and hexazinone. Keywords: Calophyllum brasiliense; Eremanthus crotonoides; herbicides; Hymenaea courbaril; riparian forest.
Volta ao índice
18
5 – TÍTULOS DE ARTIGOS CIENTÍFICOS PUBLICADOS EM PERIÓDICOS INTERNACIONAIS ESPECIALIZADOS NA
ÁREA DE PLANTAS DANINHAS
Invasive Plant Science and Management Volume 11, Issue 1, March 2018 Research and Education Indicators of Ventenata (Ventenata dubia) invasion in sagebrush steppe rangelands JONES, L.; NORTON, N.; PRATHER, T. https://doi.org/10.1017/inp.2018.7
Seed-dispersal ability of the invasive perennial vines Vincetoxicum nigrum and Vincetoxicum rossicum DiTOMMASO, A.; STOKES, C.; CORDEAU, S.; MILBRATH, L.; WHITLOW, T. https://doi.org/10.1017/inp.2018.8
Low recruitment of native trees in a deciduous forest associated with Japanese Barberry (Berberis thunbergii) invasion LINK, A.; TURNBLACER, T.; SNYDER, C.; DAUGHERTY, S.; UTZ, R. https://doi.org/10.1017/inp.2018.1
Biomass allocation, plantlet survival, and chemical control of the invasive Chandelier plant (Kalanchoe delagoensis) (Crassulaceae) GUERRA-GARCÍA, A.; BARRALES-ALCALÁ, D.; ARGUETA-GUZMÁN, M.; CRUZ, A.; MANDUJANO, M.; ARÉVALO-RAMÍREZ, J.; ... GOLUBOV, J. https://doi.org/10.1017/inp.2018.6
Impacts and best management practices for Erect Veldtgrass (Ehrharta erecta) RAY, C.; SHERMAN, J.; GODINHO, A.; HANSON, N.; PARKER, I. https://doi.org/10.1017/inp.2018.2
The influence of treatment timing and shrub size on Chinese Privet (Ligustrum sinense) control with cut stump herbicide treatments in the southeastern United States ENLOE, S.; O’SULLIVAN, S.; LOEWENSTEIN, N.; BRANTLEY, E.; LAUER, D. https://doi.org/10.1017/inp.2018.3
Native forb response to aminocyclopyrachlor CARTER, T.; LYM, R. https://doi.org/10.1017/inp.2018.5
Timing aminopyralid to prevent seed production controls Medusahead (Taeniatherum caput-medusae) and increases forage grasses RINELLA, M.; DAVY, J.; KYSER, G.; MASHIRI, F.; BELLOWS, S.; JAMES, J.; PETERSON, V. https://doi.org/10.1017/inp.2017.41
19
Case Study Callery pear (Pyrus calleryana) response to fire in a managed prairie ecosystem WARRIX, A.; MARSHALL, J. https://doi.org/10.1017/inp.2018.4
Volume 11, Issue 2, June 2018 Research and Education Seed rain and disturbance impact recruitment of invasive plants in upland forest EMSWELLER, L.N.; GORCHOV, D.L.; ZHANG, Q.; DRISCOLL, A.G.; HUGHES, M.R. https://doi.org/10.1017/inp.2018.14
Response of twelve Florida cogongrass (Imperata cylindrica) populations to herbicide treatment ENLOE, S.F.; LUCARDI, R.D.; LOEWENSTEIN, N.J.; LAUER, D.K. https://doi.org/10.1017/inp.2018.12
Case Study Invasive Smooth Cordgrass (Spartina alterniflora) eradication and native crab recovery TANG, L.; LI, B.; ZHAO, B.; LI, P.; LI, Z.; GAO, Y. https://doi.org/10.1017/inp.2018.13
Note The economic cost of noxious weeds on montana grazing lands MANGOLD, J.M.; FULLER, K.B.; DAVIS, S.C.; RINELLA, M. J. https://doi.org/10.1017/inp.2018.10
Effect of herbicide management practices used by invasive plant managers on Berteroa Incana (Hoary Alyssum) seed biology and control MENALLED, U.D.; DAVIS, S.C.; MANGOLD, J.M. https://doi.org/10.1017/inp.2018.15
Weed Biology and Management Volume 18, Issue 2, June 2018 Review Papers Review of the biotechnological applications of rice allelopathy in agricultural production CHUNG, I.; PARK, S.; THIRUVENGADAM, M.; LEE, J.; KIM, S.; RAJAKUMAR, G. https://doi.org/10.1111/wbm.12145
Development of herbicides for paddy rice in Japan HAMAMURA, K. https://doi.org/10.1111/wbm.12147
20
Research Paper Plant growth inhibitory activity and active substances with allelopathic potential of Cogongrass (Imperata cylindrica) rhizome SUZUKI, M.; TOMINAGA, T.; OHNO, O.; IWASAKI, A.; SUENAGA, K.; KATO‐NOGUCHI, H. https://doi.org/10.1111/wbm.12144
Technical Report Weedy rice represents an emerging threat to transplanted rice production systems in Japan IMAIZUMI, T. https://doi.org/10.1111/wbm.12146
Volume 18, Issue 3, September 2018 Research Papers
No‐tillage increases nitrogen scavenging by fallow weeds in a double‐season rice cropping system in China HUANG, M.; JIANG, P.; ZHOU, X.; ZOU, Y. https://doi.org/10.1111/wbm.12152
Asian spiderflower (Cleome viscosa) germination ecology in southern Iran ELAHIFARD, E.; DERAKHSHAN, A. https://doi.org/10.1111/wbm.12154
Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal symbiosis for control of Egyptian broomrape (Orobanche aegyptiaca Pers.) in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.) cultivation TADAYYON, A.; ZAFARIAN, M.; FALLAH, S.; BAZOUBANDI, M. https://doi.org/10.1111/wbm.12155
Non‐target‐site mechanism of glyphosate resistance in Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum) KURATA, K.; NIINOMI, Y.; SHIMONO, Y.; MIYASHITA, M.; TOMINAGA, T. https://doi.org/10.1111/wbm.12156
Plant growth inhibitors in turmeric (Curcuma longa) and their effects on Bidens Pilosa AKTER, J.; ISLAM, M.Z.; TAKARA, K.; HOSSAIN, M.A.; GIMA, S.; HOU, D. https://doi.org/10.1111/wbm.12157
Weed Science
Volume 66, Issue 3, May 2018 Symposium Weed management in 2050: Perspectives on the future of Weed Science WESTWOOD, J.; CHARUDATTAN, R.; DUKE, S.; FENNIMORE, S.; MARRONE, P.; SLAUGHTER, D., … ZOLLINGER, R. https://doi.org/10.1017/wsc.2017.78
21
Special Topics Detection of the Trp-2027-Cys mutation in fluazifop-p-butyl–resistant Itchgrass (Rottboellia cochinchinensis) using High-Resolution Melting Analysis (HRMA) BARRANTES-SANTAMARÍA, W.; CASTILLO-MATAMOROS, R.; HERRERA-MURILLO, F.; BRENES-ANGULO, A.; GÓMEZ-ALPÍZAR, L. https://doi.org/10.1017/wsc.2018.3
Physiology/Chemistry/Biochemistry EPSPS gene amplification primarily confers glyphosate resistance among Arkansas Palmer Amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) populations SINGH, S.; SINGH, V.; LAWTON-RAUH, A.; BAGAVATHIANNAN, M.; BURGOS, N. https://doi.org/10.1017/wsc.2017.83
Environmental factors moderate glyphosate-induced antagonism of POST herbicides on the rapid response biotype of glyphosate-resistant Giant Ragweed (Ambrosia trifida) HARRE, N.; YOUNG, J.; YOUNG, B. https://doi.org/10.1017/wsc.2017.77
Downy Brome (Bromus tectorum) vernalization: Variation and genetic controls LAWRENCE, N.; HAUVERMALE, A.; BURKE, I. https://doi.org/10.1017/wsc.2018.1
Herbicidal and seed dormancy induction activity of fermentation residual vinasse LEON, R.; VAN DER LAAT, R. https://doi.org/10.1017/wsc.2017.84
Assessment of Solidago×niederederi origin based on the accumulation of phenolic compounds in plant raw materials RADUŠIENĖ, J.; MARKSA, M.; KARPAVIČIENĖ, B. https://doi.org/10.1017/wsc.2018.8
Dormancy-linked population structure of weedy rice (Oryza sp.) TSENG, T.; SHIVRAIN, V.; LAWTON-RAUH, A.; BURGOS, N. https://doi.org/10.1017/wsc.2017.86
Weed Biology and Ecology Differential tolerance of glyphosate-susceptible and glyphosate-resistant biotypes of Junglerice (Echinochloa colona) to environments during germination, growth, and intraspecific competition SHRESTHA, A.; SOUZA, L.; YANG, P.; SOSNOSKIE, L.; HANSON, B. https://doi.org/10.1017/wsc.2017.79
Multiple herbicide–resistant Junglerice (Echinochloa colona): Identification of genes potentially involved in resistance through differential gene expression analysis WRIGHT, A.; RODRIGUEZ-CARRES, M.; SASIDHARAN, R.; KOSKI, L.; PETERSON, D.; NANDULA, V.; … SHAW, D. https://doi.org/10.1017/wsc.2018.10
22
Gene space and transcriptome assemblies of Leafy Spurge (Euphorbia esula) identify promoter sequences, repetitive elements, high-quality markers, and a full-length chloroplast genome HORVATH, D.; PATEL, S.; DOĞRAMACI, M.; CHAO, W.; ANDERSON, J.; FOLEY, M.; ... MARCUS, S. https://doi.org/10.1017/wsc.2018.2
Weed communities in semiarid rainfed croplands of central Argentina: Comparison between corn (Zea mays) and soybean (Glycine max) crops RAUBER, R.; DEMARÍA, M.; JOBBÁGY, E.; ARROYO, D.; POGGIO, S. https://doi.org/10.1017/wsc.2017.76
Effects of incorporated rye and hairy vetch cover crop residue on the persistence of weed seeds in the soil MOHLER, C.; TAYLOR, A.; DiTOMMASO, A.; HAHN, R.; BELLINDER, R. https://doi.org/10.1017/wsc.2017.80
Weed Management Investigations of 2,4-D and multiple herbicide resistance in a Missouri Waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus) population SHERGILL, L.; BARLOW, B.; BISH, M.; BRADLEY, K. https://doi.org/10.1017/wsc.2017.82
Modeling the Impact of Harvest Weed Seed Control on Herbicide-Resistance Evolution SOMERVILLE, G.; POWLES, S.; WALSH, M.; RENTON, M. https://doi.org/10.1017/wsc.2018.9
Bio-ionic liquids as adjuvants for sulfonylurea herbicides MARCINKOWSKA, K.; PRACZYK, T.; ŁĘGOSZ, B.; BIEDZIAK, A.; PERNAK, J. https://doi.org/10.1017/wsc.2017.85
Volume 66, Issue 4, July 2018 My view Weed seedbank management: Revisiting how herbicides are evaluated NORSWORTHY, J.; KORRES, N.; BAGAVATHIANNAN, M. https://doi.org/10.1017/wsc.2018.11
Physiology/Chemistry/Biochemistry Influence of soil moisture on absorption, translocation, and metabolism of florpyrauxifen-benzyl MILLER, M.; NORSWORTHY, J. https://doi.org/10.1017/wsc.2018.21
Continuous use of tribenuron-methyl selected for cross-resistance to acetolactate synthase–inhibiting herbicides in Wild Mustard (Sinapis arvensis) GHEREKHLOO, J.; HATAMI, Z.; ALCÁNTARA DE LA CRUZ, R.; SADEGHIPOUR, H.; DE PRADO, R. https://doi.org/10.1017/wsc.2018.23
23
Response of glyphosate-resistant and conventional soybean grafted plants to glyphosate CHEN, Y., JIANG, L., & DOOHAN, D. https://doi.org/10.1017/wsc.2018.18
Coevolution of two sulfonylurea-resistant Common Chickweed (Stellaria media) biotypes with different mutations in the acetolactate synthase gene LAFOREST, M.; SOUFIANE, B. https://doi.org/10.1017/wsc.2018.26
Weed Biology and Ecology Seedbank persistence of Palmer Amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) and Waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus) across diverse geographical regions in the United States KORRES, N.; NORSWORTHY, J.; YOUNG, B.; REYNOLDS, D.; JOHNSON, W.; CONLEY, S.; ... BAGAVATHIANNAN, M. https://doi.org/10.1017/wsc.2018.27
Phenology of five Palmer Amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) populations grown in northern Indiana and Arkansas SPAUNHORST, D.; DEVKOTA, P.; JOHNSON, W.; SMEDA, R.; MEYER, C.; NORSWORTHY, J. https://doi.org/10.1017/wsc.2018.12
Determination of cardinal temperatures of flax-leaf Alyssum (Alyssum linifolium) in response to salinity, pH, and drought stress MOBLI, A.; GHANBARI, A.; RASTGOO, M. https://doi.org/10.1017/wsc.2018.19
Meteorological and management factors influencing weed abundance during 18 years of organic crop rotations TEASDALE, J.; MIRSKY, S.; CAVIGELLI, M. https://doi.org/10.1017/wsc.2018.15
Seed germination and seedling recruitment behavior of Winged Sea Lavender (Limonium lobatum) in southern Australia KLEEMANN, S.; GILL, G. https://doi.org/10.1017/wsc.2018.16
The influence of environmental factors on germination of Burcucumber (Sicyos angulatus) seeds: Implications for range expansion and management TEASDALE, J.; MIRSKY, S.; CAVIGELLI, M. https://doi.org/10.1017/wsc.2018.20
Weed Management An Early-Killed Rye (Secale cereale) cover crop has potential for weed management in Edamame (Glycine max) CRAWFORD, L.; WILLIAMS, M.; WORTMAN, S. https://doi.org/10.1017/wsc.2018.5
24
Clopyralid tolerance in strawberry and feasibility of early applications in Florida SHARPE, S.; BOYD, N.; DITTMAR, P.; MacDONALD, G.; DARNELL, R. https://doi.org/10.1017/wsc.2018.14
Assessment of management options on Striga infestation and maize grain yield in Kenya KANAMPIU, F.; MAKUMBI, D.; MAGETO, E.; OMANYA, G.; WARUINGI, S.; MUSYOKA, P.; RANSOM, J. https://doi.org/10.1017/wsc.2018.4
KSTP 94, an open-pollinated maize variety has postattachment resistance to Purple Witchweed (Striga hermonthica) MUTINDA, S.; MASANGA, J.; MUTUKU, J.; RUNO, S.; ALAKONYA, A. https://doi.org/10.1017/wsc.2018.24
Generalized management strategies to delay herbicide resistance: A simulation approach WEST, A.; ALTIERI, A.; CRYER, S. https://doi.org/10.1017/wsc.2018.13
A meta-analysis of Field Bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis) management in annual and perennial systems DAVIS, S.; MANGOLD, J.; MENALLED, F.; ORLOFF, N.; MILLER, Z.; LEHNHOFF, E. https://doi.org/10.1017/wsc.2018.25
A meta-analysis of Canada Thistle (Cirsium arvense) management DAVIS, S.; MANGOLD, J.; MENALLED, F.; ORLOFF, N.; MILLER, Z.; LEHNHOFF, E. https://doi.org/10.1017/wsc.2018.6
Volume 66, Issue 5, September 2018 My view Critical next steps in combating herbicide resistance: Our view SHAW, D.; BARRETT, M.; SCHROEDER, J.; ASMUS, A.; ERVIN, D.; JUSSAUME, R.; COBLE, H. https://doi.org/10.1017/wsc.2018.42
Review Jointed Goatgrass (Aegilops cylindrica): A review MALLORY-SMITH, C.; KNISS, A.; LYON, D.; ZEMETRA, R. https://doi.org/10.1017/wsc.2018.29
Physiology/Chemistry/Biochemistry Annual Bluegrass (Poa annua) biotypes exhibit differential levels of susceptibility and biochemical responses to protoporphyrinogen oxidase inhibitors YU, J.; McCULLOUGH, P.; CZARNOTA, M. https://doi.org/10.1017/wsc.2018.30
Resistance to multiple PRE herbicides in a field-evolved Rigid Ryegrass (Lolium rigidum) population BRUNTON, D.; BOUTSALIS, P.; GILL, G.; PRESTON, C. https://doi.org/10.1017/wsc.2018.31
25
Quantifying resistance to isoxaflutole and mesotrione and investigating their interactions with metribuzin POST in Waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus) O’BRIEN, S.; DAVIS, A.; RIECHERS, D. https://doi.org/10.1017/wsc.2018.36
Prevalence and mechanism of atrazine resistance in Waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus) from Nebraska VENNAPUSA, A.; FALECO, F.; VIEIRA, B.; SAMUELSON, S.; KRUGER, G.; WERLE, R.; JUGULAM, M. https://doi.org/10.1017/wsc.2018.38
Glyphosate-resistant Junglerice (Echinochloa colona) from Mississippi and Tennessee: Magnitude and resistance mechanisms NANDULA, V.; MONTGOMERY, G.; VENNAPUSA, A.; JUGULAM, M.; GIACOMINI, D.; RAY, J.; ... TRANEL, P. https://doi.org/10.1017/wsc.2018.51
Weed Biology and Ecology Weed seedbank and weed biomass dynamics in a long-term organic vegetable cropping systems experiment MOHLER, C.; CALDWELL, B.; MARSCHNER, C.; CORDEAU, S.; MAQSOOD, Q.; RYAN, M.; DiTOMMASO, A. https://doi.org/10.1017/wsc.2018.52
Influence of crop competition and harvest weed seed control on Rigid Ryegrass (Lolium rigidum) seed retention height in wheat crop canopies WALSH, M.; BROSTER, J.; AVES, C.; POWLES, S. https://doi.org/10.1017/wsc.2018.28
Growth, fitness, and overwinter survival of a Shattercane (Sorghum bicolor ssp. drummondii) × Grain Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor ssp. bicolor) F2 population SCHMIDT, J.; YERKA, M.; PEDERSEN, J.; LINDQUIST, J. https://doi.org/10.1017/wsc.2018.34
Divergence in life-history and developmental traits in Silvery-Thread Moss (Bryum argenteum Hedw.) genotypes between golf course putting greens and native habitats RAUDENBUSH, Z.; GREENWOOD, J.; McLETCHIE, D.; EPPLEY, S.; KEELEY, S.; CASTETTER, R.; STARK, L. https://doi.org/10.1017/wsc.2018.37
Weed Management Weed communities in strip-tillage corn/no-tillage soybean rotation and chisel-plow corn systems after 10 years of variable management DREWITZ, N.; STOLTENBERG, D. https://doi.org/10.1017/wsc.2018.40
Candidate tools for integrated weed management in soybean at the northern frontier of production GEDDES, C.; GULDEN, R. https://doi.org/10.1017/wsc.2018.32
26
Soil, Air, and Water A comparison of symmetrical and asymmetrical triazine herbicides for enhanced degradation in three midwestern soils PARKER, E.; OWEN, M.; BERNARDS, M.; CURRAN, W.; STECKEL, L.; MUELLER, T. https://doi.org/10.1017/wsc.2018.41
Weed Research Volume 58, Issue 3, June 2018
Review Paper Quantification of regulating ecosystem services provided by weeds in annual cropping systems using a systematic map approach BLAIX, C.; MOONEN, A.C.; DOSTATNY, D.F.; IZQUIERDO, J.; LE CORFF, J.; MORRISON, J.; VON REDWITZ, C.; SCHUMACHER, M.; WESTERMAN, P.R. https://doi.org/10.1111/wre.12303
Original Articles Defining the habitat niche of Alopecurus myosuroides at the field scale METCALFE, H.; MILNE, A.E.; WEBSTER, R.; LARK, R.M.; MURDOCH, A.J.; KANELO, L.; STORKEY, J. https://doi.org/10.1111/wre.12300
Seedbank persistence, germination and early growth of glyphosate‐resistant Kochia scoparia BECKIE, H.J.; BLACKSHAW, R.E.; LEESON, J.Y.; STAHLMAN, P.W.; GAINES, T.A.; JOHNSON, E.N. https://doi.org/10.1111/wre.12294
Using chemical seed dormancy breakers with herbicides for weed management in soybean and wheat DAS, T.K.; DAS, D.K. https://doi.org/10.1111/wre.12295
Potential impact of weedy Brassicaceae species on oil and meal quality of oilseed rape (canola) in Australia SALISBURY, P.A.; POTTER, T.; GURUNG, A.M.; MAILER, R.J.; WILLIAMS, W.M. https://doi.org/10.1111/wre.12296
Effect of soil moisture during stratification on dormancy release in seeds of five common weed species HU, X.W.; DING, X.Y.; BASKIN, C.C.; WANG, Y.R. https://doi.org/10.1111/wre.12297
Can camels disperse seeds of the invasive tree Prosopis juliflora? ABBAS, A.M.; MANCILLA‐LEYTÓN, J.M.; CASTILLO, J.M. https://doi.org/10.1111/wre.12298
27
Seed biology of Mikania micrantha in Viti Levu, Fiji MACANAWAI, A.R.; DAY, M.D.; ADKINS, S.W. https://doi.org/10.1111/wre.12299
Volume 58, Issue 4, August 2018
Insights What good is weed diversity? STORKEY, J.; NEVE, P. https://doi.org/10.1111/wre.12310
Extended leaf phenology presents an opportunity for herbicidal control of invasive forest shrubs CAPLAN, J.S.; WHITEHEAD, R.D.; GOVER, A.E.; GRABOSKY, J.C. https://doi.org/10.1111/wre.12305
Review Papers Reviewing research priorities in weed ecology, evolution and management: a horizon scan NEVE, P.; BARNEY, J.N.; BUCKLEY, Y.; COUSENS, R.D.; GRAHAM, S.; JORDAN, N.R.; LAWTON‐RAUH, A.; … WILLIAMS, M. https://doi.org/10.1111/wre.12304
Is the current state of the art of weed monitoring suitable for site‐specific weed management in arable crops? FERNÁNDEZ‐QUINTANILLA, C.; PEÑA, J.M.; ANDÚJAR, D.; DORADO, J.; RIBEIRO, A.; LÓPEZ‐GRANADOS, F. https://doi.org/10.1111/wre.12307
Original Articles Floristic composition and species diversity of weed community after 10 years of different cropping systems and soil tillage in a Mediterranean environment CAMPIGLIA, E.; RADICETTI, E.; MANCINELLI, R. https://doi.org/10.1111/wre.12301
Evidence of synergy with ‘stacked’ intrarow cultivation tools BROWN, B.; GALLANDT, E.R. https://doi.org/10.1111/wre.12309
Assessment of the compensation point of Cirsium arvense and effects of competition,
root weight and burial depth on below‐ground dry weight – leaf stage trajectories VERWIJST, T.; TAVAZIVA, V.J.; LUNDKVIST, A. https://doi.org/10.1111/wre.12312
Can native grass species outcompete invasive goldenrods? Results of a replacement series experiment SZYMURA, M.; SZYMURA, T.H.; WOLSKI, K.; ŚWIERSZCZ S. https://doi.org/10.1111/wre.12306
28
Effects of nutrient addition and clipping on biomass production of invasive and native annual Asteraceae plants HUANG, Q.Q.; FAN, Z.W.; LI, X.X.; WANG, Y.; LIU, Y.; SHEN, Y.D. https://doi.org/10.1111/wre.12308
Volume 58, Issue 5, October 2018
Insights
Co‐operative versus non‐co‐operative farmers' weed control decisions in an agricultural landscape GONZALEZ‐ANDUJAR, J.L. https://doi.org/10.1111/wre.12314
Contribution of allelopathic effects to the overall weed suppression by different cover crops STURM, D.J.; PETEINATOS, G.; GERHARDS, R. https://doi.org/10.1111/wre.12316
Methods Additive design: the concept and data analysis OLIVEIRA, M.C.; PEREIRA, G.A.M.; FERREIRA, E.A.; SANTOS, J.B.; KNEZEVIC, S.Z.; WERLE, R. https://doi.org/10.1111/wre.12317
Original Articles The economic cost of noxious weeds on montana grazing lands MANGOLD, J.M.; FULLER, K.B.; DAVIS, S.C.; RINELLA, M. J. https://doi.org/10.1017/inp.2018.10
Effect of herbicide management practices used by invasive plant managers on Berteroa Incana (Hoary Alyssum) seed biology and control MENALLED, U.D.; DAVIS, S.C.; MANGOLD, J.M. https://doi.org/10.1017/inp.2018.15
Weed Technology
Volume 32, Issue 2, April 2018 Weed Management-Major Crops iHSD mill efficacy on the seeds of australian cropping system weeds WALSH, M.; BROSTER, J.; POWLES, S. https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2017.95
Dicamba-tolerant soybean combined cover crop to control Palmer Amaranth MONTGOMERY, G.; McCLURE, A.; HAYES, R.; WALKER, F.; SENSEMAN, S.; STECKEL, L. https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2017.96
29
A midsouthern consultant’s survey on weed management practices in soybean SCHWARTZ-LAZARO, L.; NORSWORTHY, J.; STECKEL, L.; STEPHENSON, D.; BISH, M.; BRADLEY, K.; BOND, J. https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2017.109
Evaluation of florpyrauxifen-benzyl on herbicide-resistant and herbicide-susceptible Barnyardgrass accessions MILLER, M.; NORSWORTHY, J.; SCOTT, R. https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2017.100
Soybean sensitivity to florpyrauxifen-benzyl during reproductive growth and the impact on subsequent progeny MILLER, M.; NORSWORTHY, J. https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2017.108
Glyphosate plus 2,4-D deposition, absorption, and efficacy on glyphosate-resistant weed species as influenced by broadcast spray nozzle LEGLEITER, T.; YOUNG, B.; JOHNSON, W. https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2017.88
Insecticide seed treatments as safeners to drift rates of herbicides in soybean and grain sorghum STEPPIG, N.; NORSWORTHY, J.; SCOTT, R.; LORENZ, G. https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2017.102
Effect of late-season herbicide applications on inflorescence and seed production of glyphosate-resistant Giant Ragweed (Ambrosia trifida) GANIE, Z.; KAUR, S.; JHA, P.; KUMAR, V.; JHALA, A. https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2017.101
Monitoring the changes in weed populations in a continuous glyphosate- and dicamba-resistant soybean system: A five-year field-scale investigation SHERGILL, L.; BISH, M.; BIGGS, M.; BRADLEY, K. https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2017.105
Influence of broadcast spray nozzle on the deposition, absorption, and efficacy of dicamba plus glyphosate on four glyphosate-resistant dicot weed species LEGLEITER, T.; YOUNG, B.; JOHNSON, W. https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2017.104
Weed Management-Other Crops/Areas 2,4-D–resistant Buckhorn Plantain (Plantago lanceolata) in managed turf PATTON, A.; WEISENBERGER, D.; SCHORTGEN, G. https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2017.98
Tolerance of chickpeas to postemergence broadleaf herbicides BOYDSTON, R.; NELSON, H.; CHAVES-CORDOBA, B. https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2017.99
30
Weed Management-Techniques Effect of tillage systems on the dissipation of prosulfocarb herbicide SCHERNER, A.; SCHREIBER, F.; FOMSGAARD, I.; MELANDER, B.; AVILA, L.; KUDSK, P. https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2017.103
Field pea and lentil tolerance to interrow cultivation STANLEY, K.; SHIRTLIFFE, S.; BENARAGAMA, D.; SYROVY, L.; DUDDU, H. https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2017.90
Weed Biology and Competition Japanese Foxtail (Alopecurus japonicus) management in wheat in China: Seed germination, seedling emergence, and response to herbicide treatments WANG, H.; HUANG, Y.; ZHANG, L.; LIU, W.; WANG, J. https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2017.87
Education/Extension Count nouns and mass nouns: Crops, produce, and the plural of seed MOHLER, C.; HEYNE, L. https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2017.110c
Volume 32, Issue 3, June 2018 Weed Management-Techniques Evaluation of chemical termination options for cover crops PALHANO, M.; NORSWORTHY, J.; BARBER, T. https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2017.113
Sensitivity and likelihood of residual herbicide carryover to cover crops PALHANO, M.; NORSWORTHY, J.; BARBER, T. https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2018.7
Suppression of glyphosate-resistant Canada Fleabane (Conyza canadensis) in corn with cover crops seeded after wheat harvest the previous year CHOLETTE, T.; SOLTANI, N.; HOOKER, D.; ROBINSON, D.; SIKKEMA, P. https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2018.19
Weed Management-Other Crops/Areas Rolled winter rye–hairy vetch cover crops for weed control in no-till pumpkin MIVILLE, D.; LEROUX, G. https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2018.9
Evaluation of postemergence-directed herbicides for Purple Nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus) control in fresh-market tomato BOYD, N.; DITTMAR, P. https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2018.10
31
Effects of low-dose applications of 2,4-D and dicamba on watermelon CULPEPPER, A.; SOSNOSKIE, L.; SHUGART, J.; LEIFHEIT, N.; CURRY, M.; GRAY, T. https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2018.4
Assessment of new herbicide programs for cowpea production ROUSE, C.; ROMA-BURGOS, N.; ESTORNINOS, L.; PENKA, T. https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2017.115
Weed management in common cottonwood (Populus deltoides) nursery plantation KAUR, H.; KAUR, N.; GILL, R.; BHULLAR, M.; SINGH, A. https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2017.112
Preemergence and postemergence control of Perilla Mint (Perilla frutescens): Avoiding toxicity to livestock RUSSELL, D.; BYRD, J.; ZACCARO, M. https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2018.12
Weed Management-Major Crops Interactions between quizalofop-p-ethyl and acetolactate synthase–inhibiting herbicides in Acetyl-coa carboxylase inhibitor–resistant rice production RUSTOM, S.; WEBSTER, E.; BLOUIN, D.; MCKNIGHT, B. https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2018.15
Sensitivity of grass crops to low rates of quizalofop LANCASTER, Z.; NORSWORTHY, J.; SCOTT, R. https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2018.14
Preemergence application of dicamba to manage dicamba-resistant Kochia (Kochia scoparia) OU, J.; THOMPSON, C.; STAHLMAN, P.; JUGULAM, M. https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2018.1
Benzobicyclon activity on common louisiana rice weeds McKNIGHT, B.; WEBSTER, E.; BLOUIN, D. https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2018.6
Florpyrauxifen-benzyl weed control spectrum and tank-mix compatibility with other commonly applied herbicides in rice MILLER, M.; NORSWORTHY, J. https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2017.107
Control of photosystem II– and 4-hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase inhibitor–resistant Palmer Amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) in conventional corn CHAHAL, P.; IRMAK, S.; GAINES, T.; AMUNDSEN, K.; JUGULAM, M.; JHA, P., ... JHALA, A. https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2017.111
32
Weed Biology and Competition Impact of soil pH on Cogongrass (Imperata cylindrica) and Bahiagrass (Paspalum notatum) competition PRINCE, C.; MACDONALD, G.; FERRELL, J.; SELLERS, B.; WANG, J. https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2018.3
Education/Extension Potential yield loss in dry bean crops due to weeds in the United States and Canada SOLTANI, N.; DILLE, J.; GULDEN, R.; SPRAGUE, C.; ZOLLINGER, R.; MORISHITA, D.; ... SIKKEMA, P. https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2017.116
Note
Effect of temperature on clopyralid safety in strawberry SHARPE, S.; BOYD, N.; DITTMAR, P.; MacDONALD, G.; DARNELL, R. https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2017.119
Volume 32, Issue 4, August 2018 Weed Management-Major Crops Residual activity of ACCase-inhibiting herbicides on monocot crops and weeds LANCASTER, Z.; NORSWORTHY, J.; SCOTT, R. https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2018.13
Rush Skeletonweed (Chondrilla juncea) control in pacific northwest winter wheat SPRING, J.; THORNE, M.; BURKE, I.; LYON, D. https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2018.17 Physiological basis for Tall Fescue (Festuca arundinacea) tolerance to florasulam YU, J.; McCULLOUGH, P.; CZARNOTA, M. https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2018.21
Effect of formulations and spray nozzles on 2,4-D spray drift under field conditions. KALSING, A.; ROSSI, C.; LUCIO, F.; ZOBIOLE, L.; CUNHA, L.; MINOZZI, G. https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2018.18
Row crop sensitivity to low rates of foliar-applied florpyrauxifen-benzyl MILLER, M.; NORSWORTHY, J. https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2017.114
Research Article Soybean flower and pod response to fomesafen, acifluorfen, and lactofen BEAM, S.; FLESSNER, M.; PITTMAN, K. https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2018.37
Effect of bicyclopyrone on triploid watermelon in plasticulture BERTUCCI, M.; JENNINGS, K.; MONKS, D.; JORDAN, D.; SCHULTHEIS, J.; LOUWS, F.; WALDSCHMIDT, M. https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2018.36
33
Influence of plant growth stage and temperature on glyphosate efficacy in Common Lambsquarters (Chenopodium album) DeGREEFF, R.; VARANASI, A.; DILLE, J.; PETERSON, D.; JUGULAM, M. https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2018.38
Enlist E3™ soybean sensitivity and Enlist™ herbicide-based program control of Sumatran Fleabane (Conyza sumatrensis) FRENE, R.; SIMPSON, D.; BUCHANAN, M.; VEGA, E.; RAVOTTI, M.; VALVERDE, P. https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2018.29
Response of walnuts to simulated drift rates of bispyribac-sodium, bensulfuron-methyl, and propanil GALLA, M.; AL-KHATIB, K.; HANSON, B. https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2018.28 Evaluation of cotton responses to fomesafen-based treatments applied preemergence LI, X.; GREY, T.; VENCILL, W.; FREEMAN, J.; PRICE, K.; CUTTS, G.; PRICE, A. https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2018.31 Assessment of florpyrauxifen-benzyl potential to carryover to subsequent crops MILLER, M.; NORSWORTHY, J. https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2018.33 Benzobicyclon as a post-flood option for weedy rice control YOUNG, M.; NORSWORTHY, J.; SCOTT, R.; BOND, J.; HEISER, J. https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2018.32
Weed control and tolerance of sulfonylurea herbicides in caladium YU, J.; BOYD, N. https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2018.30 Weed Management-Other Crops/Areas Managing cool-season weeds in sugarbeet grown for biofuel in the southeastern United States JOHNSON, W.; WEBSTER, T.; GREY, T.; LUO, X. https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2018.5 Evaluation of verticutting and herbicides for Tropical Signalgrass (Urochloa subquadripara) control in turf PEARSAUL, D.; LEON, R.; SELLERS, B.; SILVEIRA, M.; ODERO, D. https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2018.25
Weed Biology and Competition Vegetation control and soil moisture depletion related to herbicide treatments on forest plantations in northeastern Oregon COLE, E.; LINDSAY, A.; NEWTON, M.; BAILEY, J. https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2018.24
34
Residual herbicide effect on interseeded annual clover in southern forage systems TUCKER, J.; MULLENIX, M.; ENLOE, S.; BURCH, P. https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2018.20 Education/Extension Managing herbicide resistance: Listening to the perspectives of practitioners. Procedures for conducting listening sessions and an evaluation of the process SCHROEDER, J.; BARRETT, M.; SHAW, D.; ASMUS, A.; COBLE, H.; ERVIN, D.; ... VANGESSEL, M. https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2018.53 Managing wicked herbicide-resistance: Lessons from the field SCHROEDER, J.; BARRETT, M.; SHAW, D.; ASMUS, A.; COBLE, H.; ERVIN, D.; ... VANGESSEL, M. https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2018.49
Note Safety of bicyclopyrone on several vegetable crops and efficacy of weed control CHEN, Y.; HU, C.; DOOHAN, D. https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2018.26
Volta ao índice
35
Livro: Guia de Herbicidas, 7ª edição
Nesta nova, ampliada e reformulada edição do livro Guia de Herbicidas, são apresentadas 102 fichas técnicas de herbicidas, sendo 73 ingredientes ativos isolados e 29 misturas prontas, num total de 311 marcas comerciais. Da edição anterior, foram incluídos novos produtos e descartados outros que deixaram de ser comercializadas no Brasil.
Foi revista a descrição de cada um dos herbicidas, incluindo novas informações. Os herbicidas são mencionados pelo seu nome comum e apresentados por ordem alfabética, tanto em relação a ingredientes ativos isolados quanto a misturas prontas. Os nomes científicos e vulgares das plantas daninhas citadas neste livro são os mesmos citados nas bulas dos respectivos produtos.
Esta edição foi feita de acordo com as bulas fornecidas pelas empresas titulares dos registros e também de elementos retirados dos sites da área e das seguintes literaturas: Almeida e Rodrigues (2011); Christoffoleti e Nicolai (2016); Foloni (2016); Lorenzi (2014) e Shane (2014).
Como se trata de um livro técnico onde as informações sobre cada produto podem sofrer alterações a qualquer momento, torna-se indispensável que o leitor leia sempre com atenção a bula atualizada de cada produto, antes de usar ou recomendar qualquer herbicida. Para isso, recomendamos entrar nos sites das empresas titulares dos registros, cuja lista se encontra num dos anexos situados no final deste livro. Para cada produto, observar com atenção as restrições estabelecidas por órgão competente no estado, Distrito Federal ou Municipal.
Este trabalho é dirigido a agrônomos, estudantes de agronomia e agricultores e produtores agrícolas em geral. Esperamos que o mesmo contribua para o uso racional de herbicidas, sem colocar em perigo o aplicador, o consumidor e o meio ambiente. RODRIGUES, B. N.; ALMEIDA. F. S. Guia de herbicidas, 7 ed. Londrina: edição dos autores, 2018. 764 p.
Volta ao índice
6 – PUBLICAÇÕES
36
7 – CALENDÁRIO DE EVENTOS
Novembro 2018 Canadian Weed Science Society Annual Meeting Data: 19 a 22 de novembro de 2018 Local: Niagara Falls, Ontario, Canadá Novembro 2018 Indian Society of Weed Science Golden Jubilee International Conference Data: 21 a 24 de novembro de 2018 Local: Jabalbur, Índia Dezembro 2018 North Central Weed Science Society Annual Meeting Data: 03 a 06 de dezembro de 2018 Local: Milwuakee, Wisconsin, Estados Unidos
Volta ao índice
37
8 - NOTA DOS EDITORES
Prezado (a) Leitor (a), informamos que estamos em um momento de transição na
editoria do Boletim da SBCPD e, nesse ínterim solicitamos sugestões que, serão
assimiladas e atendidas em sintonia com a nova gestão da SBCPD. De momento,
observamos que o idealizado para os números do próximo ano, é que possamos trazer
novidades, assim como consolidar o grupo editorial do Boletim.
Aproveitamos a oportunidade para parabenizar e agradecer imensamente a
equipe editorial liderada pelo Professor Edinalvo Rabaioli Camargo, pelo excelente
trabalho realizado nos últimos volumes do Boletim. Gostaríamos também de agradecer
a todos os associados e leitores que tem contribuído com o envio de material para
divulgação no Boletim da SBCPD.
Pedimos encarecidamente que continuem contribuindo com envio de sugestões
e material para o email: [email protected]. Para o próximo número serão
aceitos comunicações técnicas, relatos, notícias e informações sobre eventos. A data
limite para envio de sugestões e material será 10 de dezembro de 2018.
Relembramos que os conteúdos das comunicações técnicas publicadas no Boletim são
de inteira responsabilidade de seus autores.
Alfredo Jr. Paiola Albrecht
André Felipe Moreira Silva
Arthur Arrobas Martins Barroso
Leandro Paiola Albrecht
EDITORES
Volta ao índice
Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas – SBCPD
Complexo Empresarial Oscar Fuganti. Rua Santa Catarina, 50 - 13º andar - sala 1302. CEP: 86010-470
Fone/Fax (43)3344-3364. Londrina – PR www.sbcpd.org