determination of particle size distribution of water ... · determination of particle size...
Post on 07-Feb-2019
246 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
Determination of Particle Size Distribution of Water-Soluble
CdTe Quantum Dots by Optical Spectroscopy
J.C.L. Sousa1, M.G. Vivas2,3, J.L. Ferrari1, C.R. Mendonca3, M.A. Schiavon*,1
1Grupo de Pesquisa em Química de Materiais (GPQM), Departamento de Ciências Naturais, Universidade
Federal de São João del-Rei, 74, 36301-160, São João del-Rei, MG, Brazil 2Instituto de Ciência e Tecnologia, Universidade Federal de Alfenas, Cidade Universitária - BR 267 Km 533,
37715-400, Poços de Caldas, MG, Brazil 3Instituto de Física de São Carlos, Universidade de São Paulo, Caixa Postal 369, 13560-970 São Carlos, SP,
Brazil
0.000 0.002 0.004 0.006 0.008 0.010 0.012 0.0140
1000
2000
3000
4000
L inear F it of R hodamine 6G L inear F it of R hodamine 101
Integrated
Pho
tolumines
cenc
e Area (a.u.)
A bs orbance λ = 355 nm
Equation y = a + b*xAdj. R -‐S quare 0.9938
ValueR hodamine 6G Intercept -‐4.68478R hodamine 6G S lope 318496.59652
Equation y = a + b*xAdj. R -‐S quare 0.99625
ValueR hodamine 101 Intercept -‐59.98849
R hodamine 101 S lope 328266.14634
Figure S1. Calibration curves for the fluorescence quantum yield of rhodamine 6G (97%) in aqueous media by using rhodamine 101(100%) as reference.
Electronic Supplementary Material (ESI) for RSC Advances.This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014
2
Figure S2. Calibration curves for the fluorescence quantum yield of rhodamine 6G (97%) and CdTe-GSH (60 minutes of synthesis) in aqueous media.
0.000 0.002 0.004 0.006 0.008 0.010 0.012 0.014 0.016 0.0180
1000
2000
3000
4000
L inear F it R hodamine 6G L inear F it C dTe-‐G S H 60 MinutesP
hotolumines
cenc
e Integrated
Area (a.u.)
A bs orbance λ = 355 nm
Equation y = a + b*xAdj. R -‐S quare 0.9938
ValueR hodamine 6G Intercept -‐4.68478R hodamine 6G S lope 318496.59652
E quation y = a + b*xAdj. R -‐S quare 0.99942
ValueC dTe-‐GS H Intercept 7.7775660 Minutes S lope 98738.85373
3
Figure S3. Fluorescence spectra of CdTe QDs (30 minutes of synthesis) obtained after ex-citation at different wavelengths.
4
Figure S4. Forward and backward analysis for the CdTe QDs (30 minutes of synthesis).
Figure S5. Pure component spectra obtained from the EFA-MCR method for the CdTe QDs (30 minutes of synthesis).
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 400
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4Forward and backward analysis
Number of spectra
log(
auto
valo
res)
450 500 550 600 650 7000
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2Pure component spectra
Wavelength (nm)
Nor
mal
ized
inte
nsity
5
QDs size dispersion program clear all; format long; %Graphic parameters COR=['b' 'g' 'r' 'c' 'm' 'y' 'k'];k=7; cor=COR(k); ft=14; aa=2.0; axy=2.0; ttitulo=11; awords=1.5; %************************************************************************ %************************************************************************ %Pathway p=path; path(p,'put the pathway'); arq_I=load('put the matrix M (n,m)'); arq_lamb=load('put the matrix W(m)'); arq_exc=load('put the excitation wavelength matrix'); arq_A=load('put the absorption spectrum data'); arq_lamp=load('put the lamp data intensity'); IF_exp= arq_I'; lamb_exp= arq_lamb'; lamb_exc=arq_exc(:)'; lamb_abs=arq_A(1,:)'; A_exp=arq_A(2,:) '; I_lamp=arq_lamp(2,:)'; lamb_lamp=arq_lamp(1,:)'; %************************************************************************ % Filter routine N=length(A_exp); N1=length(I_lamp); [m,n]=size(IF_exp); lamb_fluo_ini=lamb_exp(1); for i=1:m for j=1:n if(lamb_exc(i)>lamb_fluo_ini) if((lamb_exc(i)>=((lamb_exp(j)+2)-7)) && lamb_exc(i) <= ((lamb_exp(j)+2)+0)) M_aux(i,j)=IF_exp(i,j); else M_aux(i,j)=0.0; end end end end
6
for i=1:m for j=1:n M_aux_2(i,j)=IF_exp(i,j)-M_aux(i,j); end end M_aux_2=IF_exp; %*************************************************************** % Obtaining the absorbance value corresponding to the excitation wave-length for i=1:m for j=1:N if lamb_abs(j)==lamb_exc(i) A_exp_aux(i)=A_exp(j)+0.001; end end end %Storing the lamp data lamb_lamp=round(lamb_lamp); count=0.0; AS=mean(I_lamp); for i=1:m for j=1:N1 if (lamb_lamp(j)==lamb_exc(i)) I_lamp_aux(i)=I_lamp(j); end end end I_lamb_aux=I_lamp_aux/max(I_lamp_aux); for i=1:m IF_exp_max(i)=max(IF_exp(i,:)); end % Introducing the calibration curve (diameter versus fluorescence peak) and finding the wavelength that corresponds to the fluorescence peak aux_D=0.0; for i=1:m for j=1:n if IF_exp(i,j)==IF_exp_max(i) lamb_exp_aux(i)=lamb_exp(j); end end D(i)= put the empirical equation (diameter versus fluorescence peak); end %************************************************************************
7
% Introducing the calibration curve “fluorescence quantum yield versus diameter” aux_D=0.0; for i=1:m for j=1:n if IF_exp(i,j)==IF_exp_max(i) lamb_exp_aux(i)=lamb_exp(j); end end QY_f(i)= put the empirical equation (QY versus diameter);; end QY=QY_f; %************************************************************************ % Obtaining the percentage of QDs present in solution L=1; %comprimento da cubeta dado em cm for i=1:m Epsilon(i)=10043*(D(i)^(2.12)); C(i)=A_exp_aux(i)/(Epsilon(i)*L); %molar IF_int(i)=((IF_exp_max(i))/(I_lamp_aux(i)*QY(i)*Epsilon(i)*L*C(i))); end Q_QDs=((IF_int)/sum(IF_int))*100; %************************************************************************ %Finding QDs with the same diameter and adding them j_aux=0.0; count=0.0; for i=1:m for j=1:m if(j~=i) if (j~=j_aux) if(D(j)==D(i)) count=count+1.0; aux_D_s(count)=D(j); j_aux(count)=j; Q_QDs(i)=Q_QDs(i)+Q_QDs(j); Q_QDs(j)=0.0; end end end end end count=0.0; for i=1:m
8
if(Q_QDs(i)~=0.0) count=count+1.0; Q_QDs_aux(count)=Q_QDs(i); D_Q_QDs_aux(count)=D(i); end end %************************************************************************ % Graphs figure(1); bar(D_Q_QDs_aux,Q_QDs_aux,5,'r','linewidth',aa);hold on; ylabel('P(%) ','fontsize',ft,'fontweight','bold'); set(h1,'linewidth',2,'fontsize',ft,'fontweight','bold');
top related